Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Venezuela
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine / Why neutrality is the best course for Ukraine
Ukraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

January 10, 2025

Why neutrality is the best course for Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

The war in Ukraine, which will enter its fourth year in late February, is commonly referred to as a war of attrition. This is true enough; comparing the battlefield maps today from those in early 2024, you might have trouble finding any big differences between them. With the exception of the initial Russian invasion in February 2022 and Ukraine’s counteroffensive later that year, major territorial breakthroughs are few and far between; slow, exhausting, high-cost movement along the 620-mile frontline is the established norm.

Unfortunately for Kiev, wars of attrition favor the side with the most resources. Ukraine has fewer men than Russia to draft into the fight (Russia’s population is four times larger than Ukraine’s), an economy less than one-10th the size of Moscow’s, and partners in the West who are increasingly skeptical that the war can be won in the traditional sense of the word. Although Russia has lost an astounding number of troops—in November, the UK Defense Ministry assessed that 700,000 Russians have been killed or wounded—Moscow has thus far been able to recruit enough replacements to continue padding the rank-and-file. One can’t say the same thing about Ukraine, which is strained by a manpower shortage, has lost approximately 4,100 square kilometers of its territory in 2024, and at times makes bad decisions at the tactical level (like invading Kursk instead of adopting a defensive strategy and solidifying its lines in the Donbas).

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky isn’t blind to the realities on the ground. There was a point in the not-so-distant past when he was adamant against offering any concessions to Russia to end the war. Zelensky’s first peace plan, unveiled in November 2022, the peak of the Ukrainian army’s gains, was in essence a terms-of-surrender document to the Russians, who were at that time flailing. This is no longer the case. If anything, it’s the Ukrainians who are flailing today, and Zelensky knows it, even if he won’t express it. His tone has changed markedly over the last three months. The negotiations Zelensky spurned in late 2022 and 2023 are now being talked about by the Ukrainian president himself as the only way to end the war, even more so now that Donald Trump will re-enter the White House in two weeks with his own peace agenda.

Read at The American Conservative

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

This time, Trump’s threats to Europe look deadly serious

By Daniel DePetris

January 20, 2026

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Will NATO survive Trump?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

In the mediaGlobal posture, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

The meaning of “America First” is in flux

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy

Daniel Davis discusses the collapse of the ‘rules-based international order’ with Times of London

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 7, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

Events on Ukraine

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved