Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / When more troops mean less security
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

July 5, 2023

When more troops mean less security

By Bonnie Kristian

After a meeting of defense ministers last month, NATO leaders will convene again next week in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius. There they’re expected to approve a significant update to the alliance’s military posture on its eastern flank, where several members––Finland, Estonia, and Latvia––share a border with Russia, and several more––Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania––border Ukraine.

Right now, NATO has about “40,000 troops on standby from Estonia in the north down to Romania on the Black Sea,” reports the Associated Press. With the new plan, the alliance “aims to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days.”

The motivation is obvious: Russia invaded Ukraine last year, and last month’s failed Wagner rebellion highlighted a dangerous vulnerability in Moscow, a nuclear power. NATO’s easternmost members are eager for military reinforcement, with Lithuania long requesting a permanent foreign military presence in its territory (preferably American, though German may have to suffice).

Read at Reason

Author

Photo of Bonnie Kristian

Bonnie
Kristian

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine landmines Ukraine’s ‘turned tide’ doesn’t comport ‘with basic military reality’

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 29, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Iran Wars Are Merging Into One Big Crisis for Trump in This Sea

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 28, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky’s ‘Freya’ missile defense scheme could backfire. Here’s why.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 26, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

U.S. to make Kyiv’s Magura sea drones for the first time

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 23, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia

New prime minister assumes the reins as Britain struggles

By Daniel DePetris

July 21, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Bring the Troops Home, Mr. President

By Anthony Constantini

July 16, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.