Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / What will South Korea’s post-Yoon foreign policy look like?
Asia, Alliances

February 6, 2025

What will South Korea’s post-Yoon foreign policy look like?

By Lyle Goldstein

Amid the world’s seemingly endless political turmoil, the recently chaotic situation in Seoul deserves special notice. As I witnessed first-hand in early January, there is much to celebrate in the brave citizens and parliamentarians who stridently refused—putting their own lives on the line—to turn the clock back in South Korean history and acquiesce in the face of South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s brazen announcement of martial law  on December 3. Yoon is now behind bars, having been indicted on insurrection charges, while the Constitutional Court considers the impeachment motion against him.

Yoon had recklessly insisted martial law was necessary to stave off both internal and external threats to the country. Many of Washington’s Northeast Asia experts are now in a tizzy, since Yoon had emerged in recent years as the “poster boy” for the United States’ newly revitalized system of alliances around the world. As an analysis in the Washington Post put it, “Biden bet heavily on Yoon,” promoting the partnership in many ways—not least by having South Korea host a high profile third Summit for Democracy in March 2024, one of the previous administration’s signature diplomatic initiatives.

To put it mildly, Washington now has some significant egg on its face. As one Seoul political expert put it just before the inauguration of Donald Trump as U.S. president: “We just really haven’t gotten much pushback from the Biden administration for the fact that the ally who they courted and who courted them has gone totally off the reservation.”

Read at The Diplomat

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Asia, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved