Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / What to make of Russia’s new nuclear doctrine
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Nuclear weapons, Russia, Ukraine

November 21, 2024

What to make of Russia’s new nuclear doctrine

By Daniel DePetris

Two days after President Joe Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied Army Tactical Mission Systems (ATACMS) to strike military targets deeper into Russia, Russian President Vladimir Putin made his own formal announcement about a change to Russia’s nuclear doctrine. It likely wasn’t a coincidence that Putin’s new policy was released so closely to Biden’s decision.

While Putin telegraphed an evolution of Russia’s nuclear doctrine back in September, it’s reasonable to assume Moscow’s written version of the change was sped up by Biden’s ATACMS move. The Russians have spent months warning Washington that permitting Ukraine to employ longer-range U.S. ballistic missiles into Russian territory would be akin to Washington becoming an active participant in the war against Russia. Russian officials were hopping mad when Biden went ahead anyway. Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian president and now deputy head of the Russian Security Council engaged in his usual histrionics, threatening that U.S. that NATO targets were now fair game for the Russian military. The Biden administration, which is used to this type of fire-breathing language from the Kremlin, responded with a shrug. “Observing no changes to Russia’s nuclear posture, we have not seen any reason to adjust our own nuclear posture or doctrine in response to Russia’s statements today,” a U.S. National Security Council spokesperson said.

What should we make about Russia’s new nuclear policy? First, everybody should calm down. The Russians aren’t about to send nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles into Berlin, London, or Washington, D.C. World War III isn’t near, no matter what Donald Trump Jr. may say. Putin may be an egomaniac with imperial tendencies and a flare for self-aggrandizement, but he isn’t stupid enough to believe a nuclear exchange with the U.S. or NATO would serve Russia’s security interests. At this stage in the war with Ukraine, tactical nuclear weapons wouldn’t be especially helpful for the Russians either—Russian forces, after all, are slowly advancing on the battlefield, so they aren’t needed.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaNATO, Alliances

Foreign Contractors Stand To Gain As NATO Countries Spend Big On Defense

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 16, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Our Adversaries—And Allies—Are Learning These Lessons From U.S.-Iran Negotiations: Analyst

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 14, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Threatening NATO Over Iran Is Stupid, but Potentially Useful

By Benjamin Friedman

April 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Our NATO allies are unwilling to play Donald Trump’s game this time around

By Daniel DePetris

April 7, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump roils NATO as pressure builds over Strait of Hormuz

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 5, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.