Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Africa / US troops’ Niger exit should spur better strategy
Africa

May 14, 2024

US troops’ Niger exit should spur better strategy

By William Walldorf

U.S. troops are withdrawing from Niger, ending a decade of U.S. operations against local affiliates of al-Qaida and Islamic State. Niger is now turning to Russia for help. In a brazen (and potentially dangerous) affront to the United States, the Nigerien government has elected to house newly arrived Russian troops on a base currently occupied by U.S. forces. U.S. defense officials are calling this “a devastating blow” to U.S. security in a region “at the tipping point of being captured by the Russian Federation.” This panicked reaction makes sense given the assumptions in U.S. policy circles that terrorist threats in West Africa are a major threat to the U.S. and that our so-called “loss” in Niger is Russia’s automatic gain.

The problem is these assumptions are wrong. Drawing down from Niger isn’t some kind of strategic disaster. Instead, it’s an overdue move that secures the safety of U.S. troops and should be the basis for reconsidering U.S. security commitments in Africa writ large. If history is any guide, the U.S. departure also won’t lead to the Russian “takeover of Central Africa” some predict, but turn into a major bust for Moscow instead.

Research shows there basically is no threat to U.S. security from African terrorist groups today. At their core, groups like Jama’at Nusra al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) and ISIS-West Africa Province (ISWAP) that U.S. forces have been fighting from its bases in Niger aren’t global jihadis but are instead local insurgencies, targeting local governments. Along with just about every other terrorist group in Africa, they have never attempted to directly attack the United States or European nations. Affiliation by African terror groups to ISIS or al-Qaida is all about local objectives too — to raise their profile and money, not plan attacks against the West that they have no capability to carry out.

This means that the U.S. forces based in Africa (roughly 6,500 across 29 bases/outposts) are not countering threats to U.S. national security, but instead propping up various African regimes against these local insurgencies. U.S. troops are basically in the middle of someone else’s civil war — countering threats that present no great danger to the U.S., but greatly endanger U.S. forces.

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Photo of Will Walldorf

William
Walldorf

Senior Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Africa

In the mediaAfrica

Is This The End Of The US Africa Command?

Featuring Mike Sweeney

March 25, 2025

In the mediaAfrica, Basing and force posture, Military analysis

Why isn’t AFRICOM in Africa? Here’s a look at the command’s history and its uncertain future

Featuring Mike Sweeney

March 20, 2025

In the mediaMilitary analysis, Basing and force posture, Grand strategy

Pentagon has long been plagued by accusations of waste and fraud

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

February 11, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Global posture

Trump’s returning to the White House. Here’s how the world reacted.

Featuring Daniel DePetris

November 6, 2024

ExplainerAfrica, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Military analysis

Rethinking Africa Command

By Mike Sweeney

October 18, 2024

In the mediaAfrica

US losing ground to Russia in geopolitical battle over Africa

Featuring William Walldorf

May 1, 2024

Events on Africa

See All Events
virtualAfrica, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Unraveling the GWOT in Africa

September 18, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved