Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine / Ukraine should not be in NATO
Ukraine, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

July 10, 2023

Ukraine should not be in NATO

By Daniel DePetris

If it was up to Ukraine, the country would already have NATO membership. Ukrainian officials have been lobbying their partners in the transatlantic alliance to provide them with a clear, unadulterated path toward becoming a full member. “Ukraine is choosing the Alliance, NATO’s door is open, so it is time for an invitation to enter,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said recently. Zelensky and his advisers have influential allies in the effort; a July 5 open letter signed by a former U.S. deputy secretary of state, former NATO commanders, and a list of former U.S. ambassadors urged the alliance to “launch a roadmap that will lead clearly to Ukraine’s membership in NATO at the earliest achievable date.”

You can’t blame Ukraine for wanting to become NATO’s 32nd member. NATO is the cream-of-the-crop in terms of alliances. Members are protected by the U.S., French, and British nuclear arsenals, are given a U.S. security guarantee, and if hostilities with an adversarial power erupt, have the backing of the world’s most powerful militaries behind them. For a country that has seen some of its most beautiful cities destroyed by Russian ordnance over the last 17 months, it’s no wonder why Kyiv is fighting so hard for the upgrade.

Yet Ukraine is only one factor in the equation. The Ukrainians have the right to apply for membership, but NATO also has the right to review the application impartially, without fear or favor, based on the circumstances at the time, whether further enlargement is truly necessary for its security and with a consideration of how Russia itself might react to such a proposition.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

More European defense spending isn’t cause for celebration

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 2, 2025

Events on Ukraine

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved