Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Ukraine NATO membership for peace is a bad deal
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

October 24, 2024

Ukraine NATO membership for peace is a bad deal

By Daniel DePetris

Despite the ebb and flow of the war in Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been consistent about his overall objective: total victory. His November 2022 peace plan, which demands a full Russian withdrawal from Ukrainian territory, remains Kyiv’s official position. Zelensky’s so-called “Victory Plan,” the details of which were unveiled this month, is meant to increase the odds of success by pressuring Moscow to the negotiating table on Kyiv’s terms.

While the United States and its allies in Europe stand steadfast behind Ukraine—the White House announced an additional $8 billion in military aid during Zelensky’s trip to Washington in September—it’s increasingly clear that Kyiv’s maximalist position is out of reach. This year has been a difficult one for the Ukrainians. Although the Russian casualty rate is high, the trend lines in the Donbas have moved in Moscow’s favor. The Russians captured the eastern town of Vuhledar on October 2 and are pressing on the rail hub of Pokrovsk. Kyiv’s bet that expanding the war into Russia’s Kursk region would force Moscow to pull troops from Donetsk hasn’t paid off.

There is a growing acknowledgment in the West that the war will likely end through diplomacy. That’s the good news. The bad news is that some of the proposals on offer are unrealistic, if not counterproductive.

One of the ideas making the rounds amounts to a land-for-security trade. In exchange for Russia retaining de facto control of the 20 percent of Ukraine it currently occupies, Kyiv would receive a formal invitation to join NATO. A close look at this arrangement reveals a few gaping holes.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

More European defense spending isn’t cause for celebration

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 2, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved