Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Ukraine mineral agreement is a bad deal for Trump
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

February 27, 2025

Ukraine mineral agreement is a bad deal for Trump

By Christopher McCallion

Washington and Kyiv indicated this week that they’ve reached a deal on giving the United States a stake in Ukraine’s mineral wealth. It is expected that Presidents Trump and Zelensky might formalise the agreement as early as Friday.

While Trump has framed the agreement as compensation for US aid to Ukraine over the course of its war with Russia, Zelensky initially pitched the deal as a sweetener for continued American commitment to Ukraine. Indeed, the draft of the agreement includes a clause, insisted on by Kyiv, that the US “supports Ukraine’s effort to obtain security guarantees needed to establish lasting peace,” but includes no specific security guarantees from Washington.

While Trump sounds like he’s trying to strip Ukraine for parts, Zelensky seems to think he’s getting a future US commitment to Ukraine’s security. So who’s playing whom?

The Ukraine deal shows the problem with Trump’s tendency to view the United States’ international role in mercenary terms. While Washington hasn’t committed to anything yet, it’s possible that the US stake in Ukraine’s natural resources could serve as a backdoor for US security guarantees to Ukraine in the future.

This would be a very bad deal for the United States, perpetuating its entanglement in Ukraine amid simmering tensions with Russia while obstructing burden-shifting to Europe. In exchange, Washington is unlikely to even gain much in revenue, let alone in strategic significance, given the evidence that Ukraine’s supposed mineral wealth and rare earth reserves, hyped up by Kyiv for Trump’s benefit, are in fact vastly overstated.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Chris McCallion

Christopher
McCallion

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is Trump’s unified Republican front fracturing over Russia?

By Daniel DePetris

May 28, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Putin would be foolish to attack Nato

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s flattery and bullying of Putin have been equally ineffective – and it’s obvious why

By Rajan Menon

May 27, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Reverse Kissinger? No, Double Kissinger

By Lyle Goldstein

May 25, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Europe and US slide further apart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 23, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

New US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions Rise

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 22, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved