Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Trump’s Syria gamble
Syria, Middle East

August 22, 2025

Trump’s Syria gamble

By Daniel DePetris

President Donald Trump is a man in a hurry. Whether it’s tariffs, international trade negotiations, or immigration raids in the workplace, he can be sporadic and shifty to the point where you might think he was diagnosed with multiple-personality disorder. One day, he will post about imminent universal tariffs on a specific date, only to delay the timeline the next.

Foreign policy analysts aren’t immune to the wild swings experienced by traders at the New York Stock Exchange. Trump talks a lot about ripping up the so-called rules-based international order that has dominated global affairs for the last seven decades and is more than happy to stick his thumb in the eyes of the closest allies for any number of sins. Yet his actual policies often lag behind his razor-sharp rhetoric. Trump, for example, rightly blasts the Europeans for taking too much comfort under America’s security umbrella but maintains tens of thousands of U.S. troops in Europe. Relatedly, he rightly lambastes his predecessors for unending, stupid wars in the Middle East but then experiences a Donald Rumsfeld-like conversion, authorizing a monthslong U.S. bombing campaign against the Houthis and a short air campaign against Iran’s nuclear program.

However, there is one niche area of U.S. foreign policy in which Trump is matching action with words: Syria. This medium-sized, war-wracked country in the heart of the Arab world has often been synonymous with death, destruction, and despair. But for Trump, Syria under its new leadership is not only an opportunity for U.S. grand strategy in the Middle East but a perfect wedge to distinguish himself from what he views as a litany of failed men who held the job before him.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Press ReleaseIsrael‑Hamas, Diplomacy, Israel, Middle East

Protect the U.S. from Israel’s war in Gaza

By Rosemary Kelanic

October 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Trump’s Gaza peace plan won’t end the war

By Christopher McCallion

September 30, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

The stare down between the U.S. and Iran continues

By Daniel DePetris

September 30, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Trump pitches Gaza peace plan

By Daniel DePetris

September 29, 2025

In the mediaIraq, Middle East

Iraqi president says nation is ‘100% safe’ amid lingering ISIS, militia concerns

Featuring William Walldorf

September 28, 2025

In the mediaIsrael, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

NBC News: Daniel Davis discusses Israel’s new Gaza offensive

Featuring Daniel Davis

September 24, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved