Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Iran / Iran escalates nuclear stand off
Israel‑Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

November 22, 2025

Iran escalates nuclear stand off

By Daniel DePetris

From the moment Israel and Iran agreed to a U.S.-imposed ceasefire in June, ending a 12-day air war that the United States itself participated in, the Iranian nuclear issue has taken the form of one long, never-ending soap opera.

As far as we can tell, Iran’s 400-kilogram stockpile of highly enriched uranium remains buried somewhere underneath the rubble of Fordow and Natanz, the country’s two major uranium enrichment facilities, which were heavily damaged by U.S. airstrikes. President Donald Trump continues to insist that Iran’s nuclear program is “obliterated.” And the Iranians remain caught between a state of defiance and resignation, with hardliners and moderates unsure of whether to proactively push for another round of talks or to bunker down in preparation for more war.

The story took yet another dramatic turn this week. On Nov. 20, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Board of Governors censured Iran for noncompliance and demanded the country begin implementing a verification deal that Tehran signed with the agency in September. That protocol was supposed to result in the reentry of IAEA monitors into the country, the resumption of inspections in Iran’s major nuclear facilities, and a report, issued by the Iranian government, about the status and location of its remaining enrichment stocks.

Iran, however, responded to the IAEA’s latest resolution as it has in the past: by cutting off cooperation. The Iranians wasted no time after the IAEA’s censure. The September deal, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, is now null and void. All of this is coming at a time when the Iranians, still reeling from the significant devastation their defenses took in June, are trying to rebuild their missile capability—according to Israeli authorities, one-third of Tehran’s missiles were either used or destroyed during the 12-day war in June—and churning on with work at another underground nuclear facility at Pickaxe Mountain.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edMiddle East

The real problem with cozying up to the Saudis

By Benjamin Friedman and Rosemary Kelanic

December 5, 2025

op-edIran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

The case for diplomacy with Iran

By Geoff LaMear

December 5, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Donald Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support

By Daniel DePetris

December 2, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Alliances

Saudi Arabia and the U.S. are not allies—no matter what their leaders say

By Daniel DePetris

November 19, 2025

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy

Keep the U.S.-Saudi relationship modest

By Rosemary Kelanic

November 19, 2025

op-edMiddle East

President Donald Trump should tread carefully with Saudi Arabia

By Daniel DePetris

November 18, 2025

Events on Israel-Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel‑Iran

Does the Middle East still matter?

February 6, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024
in-personMiddle East, Counterterrorism, Israel‑Iran

Recalibrating Middle East policy

November 27, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved