Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / US-Israel-Iran / Trump’s Project Freedom U-turn shows limits of coercion
US‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

May 7, 2026

Trump’s Project Freedom U-turn shows limits of coercion

By Daniel DePetris

Yesterday morning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine briefed reporters at the Pentagon and lauded Project Freedom. The proposal was the Trump administration’s latest gambit to free up congestion in the Strait of Hormuz after weeks in which Iran had effectively closed the waterway. But by the end of the day, Project Freedom was abruptly suspended. Based on Pakistan’s request as a mediator, Trump wrote, the initiative will be paused to give peace settlement talks a greater chance of success.

Several factors may be at play in Trump’s sudden change of mood. For one, there’s a possibility that the U.S. President, a man known for embellishment, is actually telling the truth. Although negotiations between the U.S. and Iran have been slow, filled with mutual recriminations and marked by daily disinformation, reports suggest that the talks may be more productive than previously thought. Axios and Reuters have both claimed that American and Iranian officials are zeroing in on a memorandum of understanding that would establish a common framework for more technical, detailed negotiations on the nuclear file. The terms, per these reports, would end the war, gradually reopen the Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic, lift the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, and begin the process of arriving at a nuclear accord over a 30-day period. Pakistani mediators are claiming that this is the closest that the U.S. and Iran have been to signing something since the war began two months ago.

Yet this report should be treated with caution. The Iranians are casting doubt on the latest developments, claiming that the Trump administration has been making demands that have already been rejected. These include a long-term suspension of enrichment and the elimination of Tehran’s nearly 1,000 pounds of highly enriched uranium. Trump himself seemed more pessimistic about the prospects of an agreement during an interview with the New York Post. An hour later, he again took to Truth Social and warned Iran that the war would restart if Tehran didn’t agree.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

What Does the Iran War Mean for the Global Economy?

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 2, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Both Iran And U.S. Lost The War, But The U.S. Lost More: Geopolitics Expert

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

May 29, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Donald Trump’s Iran War Could Become America’s ‘Syracuse’—the Disaster That Ended an Empire

By Gil Barndollar

May 29, 2026

Op-edIsrael, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Are Trump and Netanyahu heading for a showdown?

By Daniel DePetris

May 29, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s Least Bad Option in Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

May 28, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

On BBC, Ben Friedman argues for the United States to cut a deal with Iran to open the strait

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

May 27, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.