Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / US-Israel-Iran / Trump’s Project Freedom U-turn shows limits of coercion
US‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

May 7, 2026

Trump’s Project Freedom U-turn shows limits of coercion

By Daniel DePetris

Yesterday morning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine briefed reporters at the Pentagon and lauded Project Freedom. The proposal was the Trump administration’s latest gambit to free up congestion in the Strait of Hormuz after weeks in which Iran had effectively closed the waterway. But by the end of the day, Project Freedom was abruptly suspended. Based on Pakistan’s request as a mediator, Trump wrote, the initiative will be paused to give peace settlement talks a greater chance of success.

Several factors may be at play in Trump’s sudden change of mood. For one, there’s a possibility that the U.S. President, a man known for embellishment, is actually telling the truth. Although negotiations between the U.S. and Iran have been slow, filled with mutual recriminations and marked by daily disinformation, reports suggest that the talks may be more productive than previously thought. Axios and Reuters have both claimed that American and Iranian officials are zeroing in on a memorandum of understanding that would establish a common framework for more technical, detailed negotiations on the nuclear file. The terms, per these reports, would end the war, gradually reopen the Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic, lift the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, and begin the process of arriving at a nuclear accord over a 30-day period. Pakistani mediators are claiming that this is the closest that the U.S. and Iran have been to signing something since the war began two months ago.

Yet this report should be treated with caution. The Iranians are casting doubt on the latest developments, claiming that the Trump administration has been making demands that have already been rejected. These include a long-term suspension of enrichment and the elimination of Tehran’s nearly 1,000 pounds of highly enriched uranium. Trump himself seemed more pessimistic about the prospects of an agreement during an interview with the New York Post. An hour later, he again took to Truth Social and warned Iran that the war would restart if Tehran didn’t agree.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edIsrael, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Israel is the wild card as the U.S. and Iran work to ink a lasting peace deal

By Daniel DePetris

June 23, 2026

Press ReleaseUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Resurrecting the MOU will take real pressure on Israel

By Benjamin Friedman

June 20, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Iran says it is closing Strait of Hormuz, testing fragile agreement with U.S.

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

June 20, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

U.S. push to get Iran talks started hits an early bump due to intense fighting in Lebanon

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 19, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Only Iran is happy with Trump’s peace deal

By Daniel DePetris

June 18, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

U.S.-Iran deal looks like a total capitulation

By Daniel DePetris

June 17, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Donate
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.