Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / US-Israel-Iran / Only Iran is happy with Trump’s peace deal
US‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

June 18, 2026

Only Iran is happy with Trump’s peace deal

By Daniel DePetris

President Trump might have thought that negotiating an interim diplomatic understanding with Iran was going to be the hard part. But selling the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding to the public is proving to be just as laborious.

Less than 24 hours after the document was released, virtually nobody is particularly satisfied with it. Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill, normally deferential or wholly supportive of Trump’s agenda across-the-board, are already expressing nervousness at the terms and demanding a full briefing from the administration about how the White House plans on executing them. Iran hawks who didn’t want diplomacy with Iran at all are irate that Tehran is effectively given sanctions relief on the front-end, before it has to do much of anything. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is worried about how Iran will use the cash. And the Gulf Arab states, which never thought the war was a good idea in the first place and unsuccessfully lobbied the Trump administration to double down on diplomacy instead, are upset that Iran’s missile program isn’t addressed at all.

The only people who seem pleased with the terms are the Iranians. The Iranian regime is bragging that they’ve outlasted Washington’s military might and bested it at the negotiating table. “This is a historic document and a message from a powerful Iran: peace will be realized in the shadow of mutual respect,” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said today.
Analysts will spend the coming days poring over the MOU and critiquing it. They will have much to complain about. In principle, the MOU is a common-sense attempt to rewind the calendar back to February 27, the day before the conflict erupted, and provide the United States and Iran with a few more months to determine whether the technical particularities of Tehran’s nuclear program can be resolved. It’s the details and structure of the document that has a lot of people in Washington nervous. The most troublesome aspect for most is the fact that Washington will enact sanctions waivers, allowing Iran to export its crude oil to world markets again, even before any nuclear questions are discussed, let alone tackled. At current prices, that concession could net Tehran $60 billion over the next two months.

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

U.S. push to get Iran talks started hits an early bump due to intense fighting in Lebanon

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 19, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

U.S.-Iran deal looks like a total capitulation

By Daniel DePetris

June 17, 2026

US‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

President Donald Trump and Iran get to a deal. Now comes the hard part.

By Daniel DePetris

June 16, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

White House launches full-court press to sell Iran agreement ahead of formal signing, release of text

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 16, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s deal with Iran doesn’t resolve anything

By Daniel DePetris

June 15, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Lessons in Military Deterrence from the Iran War: U.S. Strategy in Contested Waters

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 15, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Policy Papers
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.