Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / The overwrought reaction to the Trump-Putin phone call
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

February 13, 2025

The overwrought reaction to the Trump-Putin phone call

By Daniel DePetris

President Donald Trump called Russian president Vladimir Putin yesterday and discussed various topics, including the war in Ukraine, for an hour and a half. According to Trump, the two agreed to begin negotiations on ending the three year-long conflict immediately and even set up preliminary talks about traveling to one another’s capitals. Shortly after the call with Putin, Trump dialed Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky for yet another conversation that reportedly went ”very well.”

Trump’s call with Zelensky, of course, wasn’t the controversial part. Nobody had a problem with it. The dialogue with Putin, however, was apparently blasphemy, akin to violating all of the Ten Commandments on the same day. Judging by the reaction from European officials and most foreign policy analysts in the West, Trump not only sinned by talking with a morally repugnant brute like Putin who jails (and kills) his political opponents, invades neighboring countries and makes a mockery of the UN charter—he potentially upended the entire security order of Europe. With a single phone call.

It didn’t take long for the hyperventilating to begin. Carl Bildt, former Swedish prime minister, posted a picture of Neville Chamberlain after he returned from his 1938 conference in Munich with Adolf Hitler. The subtext wasn’t hard to find: Trump and his advisors are at risk of gifting Ukraine to Putin on a silver platter. Former British defense minister Ben Wallace invoked “the stench of appeasement” à la Munich 1938 in an op-ed, blasting US defense secretary Pete Hegseth for taking NATO membership for Ukraine off the table. European ministers are beside themselves; the Germans were particularly depressed, with German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock calling the Trump-Putin call “very much out of the blue,” as if Berlin was oblivious to the fact that striking a peace agreement between Putin and Zelensky is one of Trump’s top foreign policy priorities.

The Europeans do have a point on one thing: they should be a part of the negotiations. Trump, after all, ultimately wants Europe to take the Ukraine file on its shoulders. The war matters more to the Europeans than it does to the Americans by virtue of geography, so it’s only logical for Europe to participate in deliberations about what a diplomatic settlement would look like (assuming, of course, Putin is even genuinely interested in climbing down from his maximalist position; we’ve seen no sign of this yet).

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

‘Walking Away’ from Ukraine will be a logistical challenge

By Geoff LaMear

July 11, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

More Ukraine aid risks angering MAGA

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 10, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved