Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / The Taliban after year two
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

August 18, 2023

The Taliban after year two

By Daniel DePetris

Two years ago this week, the Taliban returned to Kabul with a vengeance. The insurgent group that fought U.S. and Afghan government troops for two decades were able to sweep into Afghanistan’s capital city without the slightest resistance from the very same Afghan security forces built and trained to the tune of $90 billion across four successive U.S. administrations. The Taliban, well versed in the intricacies of wheeling-and-dealing at the local level, threatened or bribed Afghan forces to surrender. Afghan troops and police officers, many of whom were stuck on remote outposts in Taliban-surrounded territory and unpaid for months, decided there was no point in fighting for a lost cause.

Fast-forward to today, and the Taliban are firmly entrenched. This week, the Taliban government organized a celebration in Kabul for what they termed “independence day,” or victory over the U.S.-led military coalition and the Afghan authorities it backed to the hilt for two decades. Yet celebrations of victory aside, Afghanistan can be charitably called a work-in-progress. The Taliban are still trying to transition from an insurgent movement into an effective government, and foreign powers, including the U.S., are still trying to learn how to deal with the new authorities.

Whether Afghanistan is faring well or poorly depends on who you ask. The Taliban are attempting to persuade the international community that Afghanistan is far better off today than it was under the U.S.-backed Afghan government, which was riddled with systemic corruption, relied on international donors for approximately three-quarters of its budget, and was composed of senior officials who were often detached from what was going on. Organizations focusing on human rights have a different opinion, pointing to the Taliban’s restrictions on women’s rights as well as a tendency to take a heavy hand against anyone showing the slightest form of dissent.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Israel‑Iran

Why China’s sitting on the Iran war sidelines

By Lyle Goldstein

June 25, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

In the mediaMilitary analysis, Asia, Naval power

Jennifer Kavanagh on BBC News: Review of AUKUS pact is warranted

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 11, 2025

op-edAsia

US-Korea alliance to change under Lee Jae-myung

By Daniel DePetris

June 10, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved