Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The misguided economics of modern territorial ambitions
Grand strategy

April 30, 2025

The misguided economics of modern territorial ambitions

By Erik Gartzke

Thomas Cromwell, destined to become prime minister under King Henry VIII, gave a speech in Parliament in 1523 opposing war with France, a war Henry was eager to pursue.

Cromwell’s decision to speak out against the war might appear odd. Warfare was endemic in that age; some nations were forever fighting other proto-states in Europe. Besides, Cromwell rose to power by facilitating King Henry’s wishes, not flouting them.

Cromwell’s reasoning was simple: Wars are expensive and unprofitable. England would be better off trading with its French neighbors than plundering them. Cromwell recognized a trend that has grown: Modern states seldom prosper from territorial aggrandizement.

Contemporary Washington is abuzz with schemes of conquest. Until recently, this trait was associated with our adversaries, not us. Russia coveted its neighbor’s territory and used force to take it, resulting in massive losses on both sides. Much like his predecessors in monarchical Europe and early America, President Trump publicly entertains territorial acquisition: Greenland, the Panama Canal, Canada and even the Gaza Strip, by force if necessary.

Read at Washington Times

Author

Photo of Erik Gartzke

Erik
Gartzke

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Op-edWestern Hemisphere

The U.S. military campaign to stop drug trafficking has failed. It’s time to move on.

By Daniel DePetris

July 21, 2026

Op-edVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

Welcome to Venezuela, American protectorate

By Daniel DePetris

July 17, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Cuba, Venezuela

What Lindsey Graham’s death could mean for U.S. foreign policy

Featuring Daniel DePetris

July 13, 2026

In the mediaVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

U.S. mobilizes for Venezuela despite Trump’s disdain for foreign aid

Featuring Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2026

Op-edVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

The powers that be in Venezuela are exploiting a tragedy as its people suffer

By Daniel DePetris

June 30, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere

New Colombian president could be the key to Trump’s drug war

By Daniel DePetris

June 25, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.