Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / The Israel-Hamas conflict is at an inflection point
Israel‑Hamas, Israel

May 24, 2024

The Israel-Hamas conflict is at an inflection point

By Alexander Langlois

The ongoing war between Israel and Hamas sits at a critical point as Tel Aviv conducts its military operation in Rafah. In this context, U.S. president Joe Biden and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are increasingly feuding in the public space, prompting Washington to utilize progressively harsher tools to prevent Israel’s Far Right government from conducting increasingly rogue actions in Gaza. Ultimately, there are real risks that the current situation could spiral out of control—something Western leaders must consider and anticipate to avoid a potential slaughter with long-term implications.

There is still a possibility that leaders can prevent this outcome through the ongoing ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israeli negotiators. On May 6, Hamas accepted a ceasefire deal that Israel previously approved with the blessing of leading mediators—namely the United States, Egypt, and Qatar. The group’s decision startled Tel Aviv, drawing accusations of foul play as Israeli leaders claimed Hamas agreed to a different deal.

Anonymous officials assert the deals are nearly identical, with U.S. officials arguing there is space for an agreement while downplaying the differences within the framework and defining Hamas’s announcement as a “counterproposal” that is very reachable. Conversely, Israeli officials still claim the deal has unacceptably wide gaps. As such, Tel Aviv continues to view an offensive into Rafah—supposedly Hamas’s last major stronghold in Gaza—as the only way to strengthen its hand in negotiations or, at a minimum, save hostages while destroying the armed group. Some Israeli officials even accused the United States of acting in bad faith by not informing them about the deal Hamas approved. Ultimately, the Israeli and Hamas texts are not all that different, with U.S. officials claiming gaps can “absolutely be closed.”

Read at The National Interest

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Press ReleaseSyria, Middle East

Drawdown from Syria a success worth scaling

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump’s global gunboat diplomacy leaves the U.S. overstretched

By Alexander Langlois

February 3, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Ignore the Hawks. Attacking Iran comes with huge risks

By Peter Harris

February 1, 2026

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved