Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / The Israel-Hamas conflict is at an inflection point
Israel‑Hamas, Israel

May 24, 2024

The Israel-Hamas conflict is at an inflection point

By Alexander Langlois

The ongoing war between Israel and Hamas sits at a critical point as Tel Aviv conducts its military operation in Rafah. In this context, U.S. president Joe Biden and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are increasingly feuding in the public space, prompting Washington to utilize progressively harsher tools to prevent Israel’s Far Right government from conducting increasingly rogue actions in Gaza. Ultimately, there are real risks that the current situation could spiral out of control—something Western leaders must consider and anticipate to avoid a potential slaughter with long-term implications.

There is still a possibility that leaders can prevent this outcome through the ongoing ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israeli negotiators. On May 6, Hamas accepted a ceasefire deal that Israel previously approved with the blessing of leading mediators—namely the United States, Egypt, and Qatar. The group’s decision startled Tel Aviv, drawing accusations of foul play as Israeli leaders claimed Hamas agreed to a different deal.

Anonymous officials assert the deals are nearly identical, with U.S. officials arguing there is space for an agreement while downplaying the differences within the framework and defining Hamas’s announcement as a “counterproposal” that is very reachable. Conversely, Israeli officials still claim the deal has unacceptably wide gaps. As such, Tel Aviv continues to view an offensive into Rafah—supposedly Hamas’s last major stronghold in Gaza—as the only way to strengthen its hand in negotiations or, at a minimum, save hostages while destroying the armed group. Some Israeli officials even accused the United States of acting in bad faith by not informing them about the deal Hamas approved. Ultimately, the Israeli and Hamas texts are not all that different, with U.S. officials claiming gaps can “absolutely be closed.”

Read at The National Interest

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Stay cool, Mr Trump

By Daniel DePetris

November 5, 2025

op-edIsrael, Middle East

The Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is in danger of shattering

By Daniel DePetris

November 4, 2025

op-edMiddle East

A U.S.-Saudi Arabia security pact is a terrible idea

By Alexander Langlois

November 4, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

There is no ceasefire in Gaza

By Alexander Langlois

October 31, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

How Trump can avoid ‘owning’ Gaza

By William Walldorf

October 28, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Now is not the time for new U.S. commitments to the Middle East

By William Walldorf

October 21, 2025

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved