Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The frenetic foreign policy of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days
Grand strategy, China, Israel‑Hamas

April 29, 2025

The frenetic foreign policy of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days

By Daniel DePetris

The first 100 days of a new U.S. administration are typically thought of as a honeymoon period for the president. It’s a time when the new team makes big promises, tries to accomplish as much as possible before the Washington gridlock kicks back in and sets the overall narrative.

President Donald Trump’s second administration is no different. One day before he took the oath of office for a second time, Trump vowed boldness and greatness right out of the gate. “The American people have given us our trust, and in return, we’re going to give them the best first day, the biggest first week and the most extraordinary first 100 days of any presidency,” Trump boasted to his supporters.

Whether one believes Trump has reached the bar he set is in the eye of the beholder. According to a bevy of public opinion polls released this weekend, most Americans don’t think he’s doing a particularly good job. What is indisputable, however, is that Trump relishes busting norms, expanding presidential power and signing dozens upon dozens of executive orders. If his first administration was often at war with itself, the second is unified and action-prone, even if those actions — such as deporting a man to El Salvador despite a court order preventing that — tie up the court system.

Trump promised big things, not only on the home front but internationally as well. While the president’s “I’ll solve the war in Ukraine in a day” shtick was never a serious proposition, it nonetheless demonstrated a sense of urgency on Europe’s deadliest conflict since World War II. Trump wanted it solved, quickly, and claimed he was the only person on earth who could do it. He said much the same about the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, which has turned the coastal enclave into an inhospitable wasteland. On trade, Trump vowed to push countries that were taking advantage of the United States into new deals. Adversaries would learn to fear America again, and allies would learn to respect it as a superpower rather than a dupe.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edGrand strategy

DOGE Has Its Sights on the Defense Department

By Gil Barndollar

May 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Big, Bloated Defense Budget

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances

Geography has given the US unrivaled security. Trump is destroying it

By Gil Barndollar and Rajan Menon

May 4, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump is learning America isn’t as powerful as he thought

By Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, Drones

Trump’s idea to use drones strikes in Mexico could make cartel violence worse

By Daniel DePetris

April 10, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Global posture

Predator or Prey? It’s the Wrong Question for Great Powers Today

By Erik Gartzke

April 7, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved