Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / The Biden administration is repeating old mistakes in Iraq and Syria
Middle East, Grand strategy, Iraq, Syria

January 26, 2024

The Biden administration is repeating old mistakes in Iraq and Syria

By Daniel DePetris

The ongoing war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip has transformed the Middle East into a constellation of flashpoints, from the Israel-Lebanon border region to the Red Sea. On January 22, the United States and the United Kingdom launched its eighth round of strikes against the Houthis in Yemen, hitting radar installations, drone and missile sites as well as underground storage bunkers in an attempt to degrade the group’s capacity to execute attacks against civilian vessels.

In general, the roughly 45,000 U.S. forces stationed in the region have managed to stay out of the thick of things. One can’t say the same thing about the roughly 3,400 US troops scattered throughout Iraq and Syria, who have been forced to duck periodic fire from Iranian-backed militias in both countries. Worse still: the troops are enduring unnecessary risks and simply don’t need to be there.

According to the Pentagon, U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria have been attacked 151 times since mid-October. The most recent attack occurred over the weekend when militias under the Islamic Resistance in Iraq umbrella sent seven ballistic missiles toward the Ain al-Asad airbase. The U.S. retaliated on January 23, striking three militia facilities belonging to Kataib Hezbollah.

Fortunately, no Americans have been killed in any of the rockets, one-way attack drones or missiles that have landed in or near U.S. bases over the last three months. But that’s entirely beside the point. The point is that the Biden administration has unwisely chosen to continue the policies of prior administrations by maintaining a perpetual deployment that serves little strategic purpose.

Read at The Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Trump’s Iran gamble is already backfiring disastrously

By Daniel DePetris

June 25, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

How Trump took advantage of Iran’s face-saving retaliation strategy

By Daniel DePetris

June 24, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved