Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel / Read the room—Antony Blinken is too optimistic on Gaza ceasefire
Israel, Grand strategy, Israel‑Hamas

June 12, 2024

Read the room—Antony Blinken is too optimistic on Gaza ceasefire

By Daniel DePetris

On June 10, the United Nations Security Council managed to do something it hadn’t been able to do over the last eight months: pass a resolution demanding a comprehensive ceasefire that would end the war in Gaza. Previous attempts to jam a ceasefire resolution through the chamber were stymied by the United States, which claimed that any action by the U.N. would complicate its own diplomatic initiative with Qatar and Egypt to bring the war to a close and release the remaining hostages.

In the end, the Security Council chose to piggyback off President Joe Biden’s three-stage ceasefire proposal. The first stage envisions “an immediate, full, and complete ceasefire” for six weeks, the release of hostages, a massive increase in humanitarian aid into Gaza, an Israeli military pullback from populated areas of the enclave, and the return of displaced Palestinians to their homes. The ceasefire would stay in effect as long as Israel and Hamas continued negotiating on an agreement for phase two, which includes a permanent end to the war. The last stage would begin the long, expensive process of reconstructing Gaza after it was essentially razed to the ground.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump’s global gunboat diplomacy leaves the U.S. overstretched

By Alexander Langlois

February 3, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Ignore the Hawks. Attacking Iran comes with huge risks

By Peter Harris

February 1, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. should pull the plug on its Syria deployment

By Daniel DePetris

February 1, 2026

Events on Israel

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved