Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Putin has little incentive to accept Trump’s peace plan
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

February 6, 2025

Putin has little incentive to accept Trump’s peace plan

By Julian Fisher

President Trump has repeatedly vowed to end the war in Ukraine. However, neither Russia nor Ukraine appears willing to accept the leaked terms of Trump’s proposed peace plan. Regardless of the outcome of his coming talks with Putin and Zelensky, Trump is in a strong position to advance American interests.

According to a peace plan leaked by the Ukrainian outlet Strana, President Trump will ask Ukraine to renounce its aspiration to join NATO, withdraw from pre-war Russian territory in the Kursk pocket and recognize Russian sovereignty over annexed territories. In exchange, Ukraine will continue receiving U.S. military support and join the European Union by 2030, while Russia will receive limited sanctions relief if it complies with the final settlement.

Although these details remain unconfirmed, they resemble the contours of Trump’s original peace plan, which was devised by former national security adviser Keith Kellogg, the man that Trump has tapped to be his administration’s peace envoy for the war in Ukraine. At the moment, the Strana leaks and Kellogg’s policy recommendations represent the most likely starting point for U.S.-mediated negotiations.

Both plans seek to entice Russia with concessions that the Biden administration was unwilling to make and that fly in the face of Ukrainian President Zelensky’s “victory plan.” Zelensky has vowed to retake lost territories, and Russia’s invasion has only emboldened his desire to see Ukraine in NATO.

Read at Real Clear World

Author

Julian
Fisher

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is running out of political cover

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

Explainer

The role of moral hazard in the Ukraine war

By Christopher McCallion

August 18, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Ukraine, Iran, and America’s Arms Overreach | Robert Wright & Jennifer Kavanagh

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 6, 2026

Op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

U.S. is the real loser if Senate passes virtue signaling Russia sanctions

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 4, 2026

In the mediaEurope and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Jennifer Kavanagh: A Historic Shift in Asia & Ukraine Is Defeated

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 2, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine landmines Ukraine’s ‘turned tide’ doesn’t comport ‘with basic military reality’

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 29, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.