Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / Joe Biden does not deserve credit for Gaza ceasefire deal
Israel‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

January 15, 2025

Joe Biden does not deserve credit for Gaza ceasefire deal

By Benjamin Friedman

Israel’s ceasefire deal with Hamas is promising news—for the surviving people who live in Gaza, for hostages, and for Israel, which could receive a respite from warfare on various fronts while getting hostages back. That is presumably one of the reasons its leaders accepted terms they previously resisted, including an eventual full withdrawal of its military from Gaza and a stated goal of making the ceasefire permanent through execution of its three phases.

A ceasefire is less important to the United States, but still a good thing. US forces are now less likely to be dragged into a war by Israel’s actions, especially with Iran. And since the war in Gaza animated Houthi attacks on shipping, its end could stop that, and by extension the failed little US war in Yemen.

But whatever President Joe Biden says, he does not deserve credit. It’s true the ceasefire reflects his administration’s stated aim, and much labour by US diplomats. But the deal’s arrival only at the end of Biden’s term—and only when his successor endorsed it—shows how feckless his policy on Gaza was, even how counterproductive it was to peace.

President-elect Donald Trump is of course taking credit for the deal, and he even may deserve some of it. It’s true that his policy on a ceasefire appears to be like Biden’s long failed approach—tell Israel to do a deal to end the fighting, but attach no consequences for not doing so. But the same demand Biden made, coming from Trump, apparently resonated differently with Benjamin Netanyahu.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edMiddle East, Grand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Now is not the time for new U.S. commitments to the Middle East

By William Walldorf

October 21, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Did decisive U.S. action restore deterrence—or has Washington simply been lucky?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

October 16, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Donald Trump declares a new dawn in the Middle East. The reality is a little more complicated.

By Daniel DePetris

October 14, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Israel‑Hamas

Has Trump secured peace in the Middle East?

By Daniel DePetris

October 13, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

The Gaza ceasefire is welcome, but will it end the conflict?

By Alexander Langlois

October 10, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Israel and Hamas’ peace deal brings relief—and a long road of negotiations ahead

By Daniel DePetris

October 9, 2025

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved