Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel / Israel’s war in Lebanon puts Syrian refugees at greater risk
Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Syria

October 22, 2024

Israel’s war in Lebanon puts Syrian refugees at greater risk

By Alexander Langlois

Israel’s recent invasion of Lebanon and subsequent bombing of much of the country is creating a new displacement crisis in the eastern Mediterranean. Of particular concern for the international community is the status of already-displaced Syrian refugees who fled to Lebanon early in the Syrian war and have largely tried to evade the government’s attempts to forcibly return them since. These refugees now face the multitude of risks associated with their home country—with the outcome of such massive displacement likely to worsen the push for forced returns to Syria on an international scale.

Indeed, world leaders are certainly monitoring the movement of roughly 1.2 million internally displaced in Lebanon. Around 405,000 people—some 70% are Syrians, according to estimates—returned to Syria in recent weeks. Some are watching out of concern for the well-being of those forcibly displaced due to fighting in Lebanon’s south and Israel’s relentless air campaign across the country, whereas some are sure to watch closely for any opportunity to return their Syrian refugee populations—particularly in Europe.

An increasing number of countries hosting Syrian refugees displaced by the fighting in their country since 2011 view the conflict as largely resolved, opting to assess certain areas of Syria as safe. This includes major regime-held governorates like Damascus and Latakia, where countries like Denmark have long advocated for returns, claiming the fighting has largely subsided there. Some states continue to take other measures, with Italy reinstating their ambassador to Syria, Lebanon forcing returns and complicating the living conditions for Syrian refugees pre-Israeli invasion, and Turkey forcing returns into newly developed communities across areas of its control in the north.

Read at Inkstick

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Israel, Middle East

Israel’s calculus on Syria

By Daniel DePetris and Rajan Menon

July 17, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

New assessment finds site at focus of U.S. strikes in Iran badly damaged

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 17, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

LTE: Attacks on Iran slow nuclear programme yet solve nothing

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

LTE: Regime change in Tehran isn’t worth the risk

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Is the Middle East really on the verge of a new dawn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 10, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

Events on Israel

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved