Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Is Ukraine’s Kursk incursion a turning point in the war?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

August 29, 2024

Is Ukraine’s Kursk incursion a turning point in the war?

By Daniel DePetris

If you’re Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky or Ukrainian General Oleksandr Syrskyi, you’re likely looking at the current map of Kursk with a smile on your face. In a span of three weeks, the Ukrainian army has notched impressive tactical gains—approximately 500 square miles of Russian territory and around 100 small villages are under Ukrainian control, and hundreds of Russian troops have been captured.

The big question is whether the war’s dynamics will change. There seems to be a general assumption that the Kursk incursion will have positive effects for the Ukrainians. But if we’ve learned anything since the war began more than two and a half years ago, it’s that projections about turning points and breakthroughs should be made with humility. There was a time not so long ago when military analysts predicted a Ukrainian triumph after Kyiv embarked on its long awaited counteroffensive. It didn’t turn out that way; the counteroffensive fizzled and Ukrainian troops were unable to push through the Russian fortifications.

Could Ukraine’s Kursk incursion be different? Sure, there’s always the possibility. For Kyiv, the three-week thrust into Russia has been more successful in terms of territorial gains than last year’s six month-long counteroffensive. At the very least, Zelensky can use the Russian conscripts captured thus far to get his own soldiers out of Russian detention—something that has already occurred.

But long-term success isn’t guaranteed.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Analysis: Putin in negotiations with U.S. presidents over the years

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Accepting ‘Ugly Terms’: Is This the Only Path to End the Ukraine War?

By Daniel Davis

May 5, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is Trump’s Peace Plan for Ukraine All That Bad?

By Daniel DePetris

May 2, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s Ukraine minerals agreement is a terrible deal for the US

By Daniel DePetris

May 1, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Russia expulsion of Ukrainian forces from Kursk removes hurdle to peace

Featuring Christopher McCallion

April 28, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine Has Already Lost The War. That’s Not Donald Trump’s Fault

By Daniel Davis

April 27, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved