Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / How will the 2024 election impact US-China relations?
China, Asia

January 23, 2024

How will the 2024 election impact US-China relations?

By Daniel DePetris

There was a time when the relationship between the United States and China had a bright future. While bilateral relations have never been particularly rosy since the two countries formally established diplomatic ties on January 1, 1979, US and Chinese leaders have long worked on the assumption that they had much to gain by deepening their cooperation and, if possible, expanding it to new heights.

This was a widespread sentiment in Washington, reflected in speeches given by presidents from both parties. “I know there are those in China and the United States who question whether closer relations between our countries is a good thing,” President Bill Clinton told students at Beijing University in June 1998. “But everything all of us know about the way the world is changing and the challenges your generation will face tell us that our two nations will be far better off working together than apart.” President George W. Bush was just as amicable four years later, when he addressed another room of students at Tsinghua University: “China is on a rising path, and America welcomes the emergence of a strong and peaceful and prosperous China.”

Decades removed, those remarks strike many as naive. Yesterday’s atmosphere of guarded optimism has been replaced by much greater suspicion. The US and China are the two largest military spenders and compose approximately 43 percent of the world’s economic output. Yet the two great powers remain ready to leap at each other’s throats. The US Defense Department labels China its principal competitor and “pacing challenge,” while the Chinese army, the PLA, has devoted decades to re-arming and modernizing to balance against, if not break, US dominance in Asia.

Read at The Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

The US must make hard choices on national security

By Lyle Goldstein

May 27, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Deterrence, Taiwan

Asia is getting shortchanged as the US keeps its focus elsewhere

By Daniel DePetris

May 27, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Reverse Kissinger? No, Double Kissinger

By Lyle Goldstein

May 25, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Hegseth is taking the Army on another dead end ride to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 20, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

It’s Time for Trump and Xi to Meet

By Lyle Goldstein

May 17, 2025

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Great power competition, Middle East

Virtual: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved