Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Venezuela / Hegseth dropped big Venezuela easter egg in Quantico speech
Venezuela, Americas

November 3, 2025

Hegseth dropped big Venezuela easter egg in Quantico speech

By Jennifer Kavanagh

On September 30, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth summoned nearly 800 of America’s military generals, admirals, and senior enlisted officers to Quantico, Virginia on short notice. Though the unprecedented event was written off by many as a political stunt, a month later, it is clear the gathering was more important than many realized.

Of particular note were the speeches delivered by Hegseth and President Donald Trump which offer the clearest articulation yet of how the Trump administration thinks about and hopes to use military power. What’s more, taken together, the two sets of remarks appear to foreshadow both the current U.S. military build-up underway in the Caribbean and what might be on the horizon as U.S. operations there and elsewhere continue.

The key moment in Hegseth’s talk came near the end. “The United States has not won a major theater war since the name was changed to the Department of Defense in 1947,” he told the assembled audience, repeating President Trump’s rationale for jettisoning the Department’s old moniker in favor of its new one: The Department of War. “One conflict stands out in stark contrast, the Gulf War,” he continued. “Why? Well, there’s a number of reasons, but it was a limited mission with overwhelming force and a clear end state.”

Many were puzzled at Hegseth’s call-up of this short-lived military operation from 35 years ago. After all, the first Gulf War, though widely considered a success at the time, ushered in three decades of heavy U.S. military involvement in the Middle East and, in many ways, set the stage for the very “forever wars” in Iraq and Afghanistan that Trump had campaigned against.

Hegseth’s point, however, was different. The Gulf War, he was telling those listening in person and at home, was an example of how the United States should be using military force going forward. Overwhelming military power that quickly annihilates the adversary, in pursuit of limited goals. Massive force, short duration, quick victory, no long-term commitment.

Read at Responsible Statecraft

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edVenezuela, Americas

The regime change temptation in Venezuela

By Alexander Downes and Lindsey O'Rourke

October 31, 2025

In the mediaVenezuela, Americas

U.S. flexes its military power, but regime change in Venezuela wouldn’t be easy

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

October 30, 2025

In the mediaAmericas

Trump’s feud with Colombian leader threatens U.S. antidrug efforts

Featuring Daniel DePetris

October 28, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Venezuela

Defining a Monroe doctrine for the Caribbean

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 27, 2025

In the mediaVenezuela, Americas, Military analysis

Trump supporters are uneasy about military actions against Venezuela

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Daniel DePetris

October 23, 2025

op-edVenezuela, Americas

Donald Trump brings the war on terrorism to the Caribbean

By Daniel DePetris

October 21, 2025

Events on Venezuela

See All Events
virtualVenezuela, Americas

Perils of regime change in Venezuela and beyond

October 28, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved