Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Geography is a dealbreaker for coalition building in Asia
China, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Military analysis, Taiwan

July 14, 2024

Geography is a dealbreaker for coalition building in Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

At the 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin touted a “new convergence” between the United States and its Indo-Pacific allies and partners that is “defining a new era of security in the Indo-Pacific.” Austin came with a list of accomplishments to back it up, hailing expanded U.S. military access to bases in Australia and the Philippines, a “new era” in U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral cooperation, and co-production deals with India.

But this “new convergence” is more of an illusion than reality. As we argued in a longer piece in the Washington Quarterly, the United States still lacks military access to critical parts of Asia, a robust regional security network, and well-armed allies and partners capable of self-defense. Worse, trying harder will not solve these myriad problems because the region’s geography—its vast distances and maritime environment—works against coalition-building. Instead of trying to outmatch or outcompete China, Washington should acknowledge the geographic reality and build a more narrow but sustainable coalition to balance Chinese power and prevent Beijing’s regional hegemony.

Read at Lawfare

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

EDITORIAL: Cheng’s celebrations premature

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

April 30, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Asia, China, Iran, Middle East

Iran killed any delusions of U.S. military domination over China

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 29, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, China, Iran, Middle East, Military analysis

Trump says U.S. caught Chinese ‘gift’ for Iran, testing red line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 22, 2026

Op-edChina, Asia, Iran, Middle East

War has significantly altered major Trump meeting with Xi

By Lyle Goldstein

April 22, 2026

Op-edChina, Asia, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Taiwan’s KMT offers U.S. an off-ramp from war with China

By Lyle Goldstein

April 22, 2026

In the mediaChina, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump’s Hormuz blockade unlikely to draw China into Iran war

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

April 15, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.