Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / Doing something can be worse than doing nothing
Israel‑Hamas, Grand strategy, Israel, Middle East

June 14, 2024

Doing something can be worse than doing nothing

By Alexander Langlois

Winston Churchill once argued that “perfection is the enemy of progress” — a statement that certainly does not describe the US pier operation in Gaza. While the publicly stated goal of alleviating the humanitarian suffering of Palestinians trapped in the small coastal enclave is commendable, the reality is that the project was a failure before it broke apart. Rather than opt for additional band-aid fixes, the Biden administration should simplify its approach — namely by pressuring Israel to allow aid into Gaza from land crossings while providing relief workers real security guarantees.

The humanitarian situation has deteriorated in Gaza since Israel’s invasion following the Hamas attacks of October 7. An ongoing Israeli and Egyptian blockade of the territory — which the Israeli government hardened in October — has most of the roughly 2.5 million Palestinians in Gaza struggling to survive. According to the United Nations, 1.1 million Palestinians face catastrophic levels of food insecurity, or famine conditions, with another 1.7 million displaced.

Washington has pressured Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza, albeit sporadically. The Biden administration also began working with regional partners to conduct airdrops into the enclave.

Both efforts proved to have serious limitations due to Israeli slow-rolling and the inefficiency of airdrops, leading Biden to announce plans to deploy the temporary pier operation. The administration stressed that no US troops would be on the ground in Gaza for the operation. It also argued the pier would cost roughly $180 million initially, with those costs increasing to $320 million over time.

Read at The Critic

Author

Alexander
Langlois

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump faces split among retired U.S. commanders over whether to resume Iran strikes

Featuring Daniel Davis

May 13, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump calls Iran’s latest proposal ‘garbage’

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

May 12, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Hegseth Asks for More Money as Iran War Costs Skyrocket

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Back to square one: Trump rejects Iran’s response to peace proposal as ‘totally unacceptable’

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 11, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Director of Military Analysis at Defense Priorities Jennifer Kavanagh on the latest in Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 9, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Why Trump’s efforts to force Iran to concede to U.S. demands aren’t working

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

May 8, 2026

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.