Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / ‘Blinking red’: The risk to America’s national security greater than appears
Grand strategy, China, China‑Taiwan, Global posture, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine

August 1, 2024

‘Blinking red’: The risk to America’s national security greater than appears

By Daniel Davis

Former Rep. Jane Harmon, co-chair of the congressionally mandated Commission on the National Defense Strategy to assess the viability of America’s defense strategy, warned in a just-released report that the security environment for the United States is “blinking red.” While the report details a number of valid concerns, it is what the report doesn’t say that should be most alarming.

There is a major and alarming imbalance between the United States’ stated strategic objectives and the resources necessary to attain them. This imbalance cannot be rectified by spending more money on national defense. What is needed—desperately needed—is an immediate recognition that without major changes in our foreign policy and military capacity, we place our very national security at unacceptable risk.

The report warns that since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the “no-limits” partnership between China and Russia “has only deepened and broadened to include a military and economic partnership with Iran and North Korea.” This new alignment of nations opposed to U.S. interests, the report continued, “creates a real risk, if not likelihood, that conflict anywhere could become a multi-theater or global war.”

America, the authors contend, “is unable to meet the equipment, technology, and munitions needs of the United States and its allies and partners,” to engage in such a global fight. To change that dynamic, they argue the U.S. needs to create “much greater capacity to produce, maintain, and replenish weapons and munitions. Addressing the shortfall will require increased investment, additional manufacturing and development capacity, joint and coproduction with allies, and additional flexibility in acquisition systems.”

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Skirting Taiwan will not spare Trump and Xi a future crisis

By Lyle Goldstein

October 31, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

Xi Jinping just buried the age of American hegemony

By Daniel DePetris

October 30, 2025

op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

When he meets with China’s Xi, Trump should finish what Henry Kissinger started

By Lyle Goldstein

October 29, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Asia, China

America shouldn’t pivot to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 28, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Asia

President Donald Trump wants to meet with Kim Jong Un again. But what about Kim?

By Daniel DePetris

October 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Trump should stay the course on China

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 27, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved