Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Biden is still living in the 1990s
Grand strategy, Israel‑Hamas, Ukraine‑Russia

October 28, 2023

Biden is still living in the 1990s

By Daniel DePetris

Can the United States continue to arm Ukraine, even as it accelerates military support to Israel? Will Washington have to make a choice between the two conflicts? And if so, which one should be prioritised?

Right now, the US is full steam ahead on supporting Israel and ensuring its closest partner in the Middle East has what it needs to eradicate Hamas, a terrorist organisation that committed the worst attack on Israeli soil since the state’s founding 75 years ago. Ukraine, like Israel, is also in the fight of its life and is campaigning for long-term US military support, calls Biden is sympathetic too.

With aid to Ukraine becoming a divisive issue in the US and Europe’s security arguably more impacted by how the war proceeds, one would think the White House would devote as much time pushing its European allies into owning the Ukraine file as it does in lobbying Capitol Hill for more funds.

For President Joe Biden, the question of priorities is immaterial. “We’re the United States of America for God’s sake, the most powerful nation in the history—not in the world, in the history of the world,” he told CBS 60 Minutes’ Scott Pelley on October 15. “We can take care of both of these and still maintain our overall international defense.”

Read at The Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

ExplainerBurden sharing, Basing and force posture, Europe and Eurasia

Stop bargaining with Europe, start leaving

By Benjamin Friedman and Moritz Graefrath

May 27, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGrand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: How does it deal with defense deficits?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.