Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Biden is still living in the 1990s
Grand strategy, Israel‑Hamas, Ukraine‑Russia

October 28, 2023

Biden is still living in the 1990s

By Daniel DePetris

Can the United States continue to arm Ukraine, even as it accelerates military support to Israel? Will Washington have to make a choice between the two conflicts? And if so, which one should be prioritised?

Right now, the US is full steam ahead on supporting Israel and ensuring its closest partner in the Middle East has what it needs to eradicate Hamas, a terrorist organisation that committed the worst attack on Israeli soil since the state’s founding 75 years ago. Ukraine, like Israel, is also in the fight of its life and is campaigning for long-term US military support, calls Biden is sympathetic too.

With aid to Ukraine becoming a divisive issue in the US and Europe’s security arguably more impacted by how the war proceeds, one would think the White House would devote as much time pushing its European allies into owning the Ukraine file as it does in lobbying Capitol Hill for more funds.

For President Joe Biden, the question of priorities is immaterial. “We’re the United States of America for God’s sake, the most powerful nation in the history—not in the world, in the history of the world,” he told CBS 60 Minutes’ Scott Pelley on October 15. “We can take care of both of these and still maintain our overall international defense.”

Read at The Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Salvaging a New START

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 30, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Greenland, NATO, Western Hemisphere

Donald Trump is endangering U.S. alliances

By Christopher McCallion

January 30, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Greenland, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’ flaunts U.S. expansionism and intervention. But will it pay off long-term?

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 25, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Greenland, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s Board of Peace could turn into a rat race

By Daniel DePetris

January 23, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved