Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Are tensions in the South China Sea at risk of explosion?
China, Asia

September 10, 2024

Are tensions in the South China Sea at risk of explosion?

By Daniel DePetris

While the world’s attention largely remains fixated on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, U.S. officials across the national security apparatus also have another part of the globe on their minds: the South China Sea. This vast expanse of islands, reefs, rocks and atolls is the site of contested claims among multiple Asian countries, and its maritime boundaries are about as clear as an inkblot. China, Asia’s paramount great power, has claimed about 90% of the waters for itself, and it is using its large coast to press those claims more aggressively.

Typically, China’s smaller Asian neighbors choose to register their disapproval in public statements and work to brush the long-running disputes under the rug. The last thing Vietnam, Indonesia, Brunei and Malaysia want is a dog fight with a superior military adversary—better to settle the differences or mitigate the fallout to ensure the parties don’t stumble into a conflict.

The Philippines, however, has taken a more brash approach. Instead of de-facto permitting China to run roughshod over the seas, Manila under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is in essence giving Beijing the middle finger by sailing throughout its own exclusive economic zone, waters that extend 200 nautical miles from its shoreline. In terms of international law, this is a legitimate response. But in terms of managing the South China Sea dispute with China as peacefully as possible, the Philippines’ policy runs the risk of forcing Beijing to respond even more impetuously, potentially causing repeated clashes to mushroom into a conflict nobody wants.

Such a contingency would have extreme consequences for the United States, which is a treaty ally of the Philippines and has made clear that any attacks against Philippine armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the South China Sea would compel Washington and Manila to invoke Article 4 of the Mutual Defense Treaty. That clause, while a bit ambiguous, leaves open the option of the U.S. taking military action to come to Manila’s defense. Needless to say, a scenario in which the world’s two largest economic powers—the U.S. and China account for 42% of the globe’s gross domestic product—are shooting at each other over a bunch of uninhabited reefs is equally parts calamitous and absurd.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Military analysis

America needs to take better care of its military

By Dan Caldwell

July 28, 2025

ExplainerNATO, China, Russia

Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 24, 2025

op-edAsia, Burden sharing, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved