Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Nuclear weapons / A panicked case for nuclear weapons modernization
Nuclear weapons, Grand strategy

November 1, 2023

A panicked case for nuclear weapons modernization

By Scott Strgacich

A little-noticed bipartisan report released last month calls for the United States to take part in a new nuclear arms race. The unceremonious debut of the Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States flew largely under the radar of a foreign policy commentariat presently encaptivated by Hamas’ attacks on Israel and the conflict that has erupted in Gaza.

The report was, however, noticed by a slew of nuclear experts who were dismayed by its hawkish contents. Naturally, they took to X (formally Twitter) to scorch it. Hans Kristensen at the Federation of American Scientists argued the report “reads more like a nuclear industry pitch than a Congressional study.” Carnegie’s Ankit Panda said it was “all too predictable.” Nuclear analyst Pavel Podvig simply called it “garbage.”

Yet, the report’s relevance goes well beyond niche online policy discourses—and its recommendations for the future of America’s nuclear forces are as disturbing as its title is antiseptic. Simply put, it says the United States needs to develop more nuclear forces, and faster.

Read at Inkstick

Author

Photo of Scott Strgacich

Scott
Strgacich

Former Research Associate

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

In the mediaVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

U.S. mobilizes for Venezuela despite Trump’s disdain for foreign aid

Featuring Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2026

Op-edVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

The powers that be in Venezuela are exploiting a tragedy as its people suffer

By Daniel DePetris

June 30, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere

New Colombian president could be the key to Trump’s drug war

By Daniel DePetris

June 25, 2026

Op-edMexico, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s Counterproductive Mexico Policy

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere, Mexico

The Pentagon is blending the war on drugs with counterterrorism. It isn’t working.

By Daniel DePetris

May 26, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Venezuela

The ‘Donroe Doctrine’ Divide

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 24, 2026

Events on Nuclear weapons

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualChina, Nuclear weapons

Raising the minimum: explaining China’s nuclear buildup

May 19, 2022
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.