Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / Trump’s cabinet may be ‘China hawk’ in name only, analysts say
Asia, China, Diplomacy, Grand strategy

November 21, 2024

Trump’s cabinet may be ‘China hawk’ in name only, analysts say

The prospect of a new foreign policy has attracted some relatively newer think tanks to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s estate in Florida, where the transition team is working in full gear. Defense Priorities, a Washington group that advocates for restrained U.S. foreign policy, has deployed representatives to discuss policies with the Trump team and pitch its members as potential candidates for government jobs.

A member told Nikkei Asia the scale of engagement is incomparable to 2020, when the group merely submitted policy papers to the incoming Biden administration.

Reid Smith, vice president of foreign policy at the American billionaire Charles Koch-backed group Stand Together, which also advocates for restraint, said he was optimistic that Trump could move relations with China to “a more stable, modus vivendi” despite his appointments.

If Trump wants a deal with China, “his staff will work in furtherance of the principle’s policy-preference, as opposed to offering the sort of outright staff insubordination witnessed in the last administration,” Smith said.

Unlike in Trump’s first term, when national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo worked around the president to steer policy into certain directions, “the ideological determination is probably lower” with the hawks in Trump’s second administration, Smith said.

Read at Nikkei Asia

The Latest

Press ReleaseSyria, Middle East

Drawdown from Syria a success worth scaling

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Welcome to a Global Nuclear Arms Dilemma

By Daniel DePetris

February 6, 2026

op-edVenezuela, Western Hemisphere

LTE: Trump rakes the path of least resistance in Venezuela

By Daniel DePetris

February 5, 2026

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualAsia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Asia Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved