Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Africa / Is This The End Of The US Africa Command?
Africa

March 25, 2025

Is This The End Of The US Africa Command?

Some military analysts do support the plan, including Michael Sweeney, non-resident fellow at the Defense Priorities think-tank.  Arguing that “if the goal is to eventually reduce the US military lead in African policy, maintaining a dedicated combatant command for the continent makes less sense.”  So, Hodges argues, “suggesting a dedicated combatant commander for Africa is not required should not be conflated with saying that the continent is irrelevant to US interests.  Rather it is to argue that the United States does not need a military lead to demonstrate that relevance.”

And, he went on to say, “a three-star subcommand under EUCOM would still afford the United States a focused commander for planning and implementing military operations as needed.  Yet, it would remove an important player—an elite four-star combatant commander—in a bureaucratic game that shapes the overall US policy approach in Africa, which currently hues toward a military focus.”  Still, he insisted, “the United States went for six decades without a dedicated four-star commander for Africa.  It should not be afraid to do so again.”

Of course, the demilitarization of US policy toward Africa is not what Secretary Hegseth and President Trump have in mind.  And, a less militarized policy is no longer possible, since the US Agency for International Development and other instruments of American “soft power” have been systematically dismantled.  But Sweeney’s analysis was published weeks before the elections of November 2024 and he may not have anticipated Donald Trump’s victory.  The Trump administration clearly intends to expand both the scope and scale of US military involvement in Africa.  It just wants to do it on the cheap.  According to the briefing document cited by NBC News and CNN, the merger of US Africa Command, along with the proposed merger of US Southern Command and US Northern Command, would save $270 million in the first year.  That savings would amount to roughly 0.03% of the Defense Department’s $850 billion annual budget.

Read at Eurasia Review

Featuring

Mike
Sweeney

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Africa

In the mediaAfrica, Basing and force posture, Military analysis

Why isn’t AFRICOM in Africa? Here’s a look at the command’s history and its uncertain future

Featuring Mike Sweeney

March 20, 2025

In the mediaMilitary analysis, Basing and force posture, Grand strategy

Pentagon has long been plagued by accusations of waste and fraud

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

February 11, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Global posture

Trump’s returning to the White House. Here’s how the world reacted.

Featuring Daniel DePetris

November 6, 2024

ExplainerAfrica, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Military analysis

Rethinking Africa Command

By Mike Sweeney

October 18, 2024

op-edAfrica

US troops’ Niger exit should spur better strategy

By William Walldorf

May 14, 2024

In the mediaAfrica

US losing ground to Russia in geopolitical battle over Africa

Featuring William Walldorf

May 1, 2024

Events on Africa

See All Events
virtualAfrica, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Unraveling the GWOT in Africa

September 18, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved