Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / China’s third plenum shows it is ‘not in the mood’ to slow down on nuclear arms
Asia, China, Nuclear weapons, Taiwan

July 24, 2024

China’s third plenum shows it is ‘not in the mood’ to slow down on nuclear arms

Top
Jump to Section
  1. Featuring

Lyle Goldstein, the director of Asia Engagement at US think tank Defense Priorities, said while the U.S.-China military rivalry and Beijing’s major nuclear weapons build-up began at least a decade ago, “the Ukraine war and the rather acute tensions surrounding the Taiwan issue at present likely do impact these calculations”.

However, there were “some encouraging signs”, he said, in that many Chinese experts saw the “serious consideration of Russian use of nuclear weapons in this war [as] appalling, risky, and strategically dubious”.

China continues to maintain a “no first use” nuclear weapons policy but according to Goldstein, its approach to strategic deterrence—historically different to the West’s—is gradually shifting.

He identified the change in Beijing’s attitude from a “minimal but efficient second-strike deterrent” to accepting that large, diverse arsenals were “normal” and that the possibility of limited nuclear war could not be ruled out.

To prevent U.S.-China nuclear rivalry or even a nuclear conflict, “the simple answer is that we must all act urgently to reach a near-term compromise solution on the difficult Taiwan issue”.

According to Goldstein, the self-ruled island is the “only issue that could spark a nuclear war between the two superpowers”.

“The only way to avoid that outcome [of nuclear conflict], and the closely related problem of an incredibly expensive and wasteful rivalry … is to embark on a set of specific compromises involving Washington, Taipei and Beijing. This is difficult, but quite achievable.”

Read at South China Morning Post

Featuring

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

Kavanagh and Wertheim Respond: Why Taiwan’s Survival Depends on Realistic Defense

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim

April 28, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

US should look before it leaps into South China Sea

April 18, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations

By Daniel DePetris

April 17, 2025

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024
virtualChina, Asia, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rocks, reefs, and resolve? Examining the purpose of U.S. policy in the South China Sea

December 12, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved