Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Biden’s case for exiting Afghanistan is right
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

July 8, 2021

Biden’s case for exiting Afghanistan is right

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 8, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—In a press conference this afternoon, President Biden defended his decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan and conclude America’s longest war. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“President Biden is right: After 20 years, thousands of casualties, and $2 trillion in spending and little to show for it, U.S. troop withdrawal is long overdue. The U.S. military mission in Afghanistan was intended to degrade Al-Qaeda and punish the Taliban for granting them refuge, not be a generation-long nation building mission. Nation building abroad was always a costly tangent to countering would-be terrorists with the intent and capability to strike the U.S., and it proved a predictable failure.

“The evident weakness of the Afghan military in the face of recent Taliban advances is a tragedy for Afghans, but not a reason for U.S. troops to stay there. It is rather an indictment of the mission that kept U.S. troops there so long. We should be outraged not by the Afghan military’s failure, but by all the myths we were told about its capability. The fact that the mission failed cannot be a reason to prolong it endlessly.

“Whatever one makes of the speed and logistics of the troop withdrawal, the decision to withdraw is right. Maintaining a U.S. military presence would have violated the February 2020 Doha agreement, giving the Taliban an excuse to resume operations against U.S. forces or renege on their counterterrorism agreement.

“While there are costs to leaving, the costs of staying would be far higher. The United States should now apply the logic behind the Afghanistan withdrawal to other occupations that have lasted too long, especially in Iraq and Syria.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Asia, China, Middle East, North Korea

Will the U.S. strikes on Iran push China and North Korea to ramp up their nuclear arms programmes?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 27, 2025

In the mediaIran, China, Israel‑Iran, Middle East, Russia

Iran relies on China and Russia. They didn’t show up for its fight with Israel.

June 26, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved