Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / The U.S. is better off out of Afghanistan
Afghanistan

August 30, 2021

The U.S. is better off out of Afghanistan

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 30, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, U.S. officials announced the last American planes have left Afghanistan, bringing an end to America’s longest war. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“As great a tragedy as the war has been, it can still be worse if we listen to those who blame all Afghanistan’s problems on the U.S. exit and tell us there was a competent way to do it.

“The great error of the war in Afghanistan wasn’t its ending, whatever the mistakes made in the final U.S. exit. The problem was continuing to participate in the war so long in the face of so many indications it was failing—indeed, that it would’ve been worthwhile even had it worked better. The Biden administration deserves credit for staying focused on the national interest and getting out despite the chorus of Washington establishment howls lamenting the war’s end.

“The U.S. exit comes at least a decade too late. By 2002, the United States had accomplished the aims that justified our invasion of Afghanistan, with Al-Qaeda’s leaders dead, captured, on the run, and the Taliban punished for hosting them. As that war was won, a new unwinnable one began, when the United States slid into a growing nation-building campaign unnecessary to U.S. security.

“Certainly by the time a U.S. raid killed Osama bin Laden in 2011, it was clear that U.S. counterterrorism aims could be achieved without trying to turn Afghanistan into a modern state with a unified and competent government. U.S. forces should already have largely departed by then, rather than being surged for a massive counterinsurgency campaign. The terrible costs of those decisions are well known: more than a trillion dollars wasted, 2,461 U.S. servicemembers and civilians killed, and many more Afghans lost, mostly for nothing lasting: to build a state that proved a failed one.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Afghanistan

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

February 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, China, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

January 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, Americas, Europe and Eurasia, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Biden exits, he grapples with his foreign policy legacy

By Daniel DePetris

January 9, 2025

op-edSyria, Afghanistan, Middle East, Russia

Who lost more weapons—Russia in Syria or America in Afghanistan?

By Gil Barndollar

December 17, 2024

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved