Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Expanding NATO to Finland and Sweden is gambling with U.S. and European security
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

May 12, 2022

Expanding NATO to Finland and Sweden is gambling with U.S. and European security

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 12, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Finland announced that the country will apply for NATO membership. Sweden is expected to make a similar announcement soon. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The United States should carefully debate NATO expansion to Finland and Sweden, not proceed swiftly in a knee-jerk attempt to punish Russia. At stake is adding two more states Americans might fight a war for—or use nuclear weapons to defend. Neither states’ membership adds to the security of the United States. So U.S. support should probably be withheld, especially for Finland, at least absent assurances from European states that they will take the lead in defending these Nordic countries if necessary, rather than relying, as usual, on U.S. efforts.

“The question of Finland and Sweden joining NATO is, if anything, less urgent today because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The war has eroded Russia’s conventional power and demonstrates its capability is not what was once feared.

“It is true each state has a capable military, including a useful navy. Their accession might be helpful in defending the Baltics, but capability is also a reason why these states don’t need NATO. The two states have collectively only about 45,000 active duty forces; too few to add much for alliance defense. Finland’s large reserve isn’t much use unless someone invades Finland.

“The case of making Finland a NATO member is especially troubled. Finland has long been a model of neutrality, which has worked rather well for it. Because it shares an 830-mile border with Russia, joining NATO might invite further antagonization from Moscow. If Finland does join, Europeans, not Americans, should commit troops to Finland’s border, as the U.S. does too much for European defense already and has less at stake in Scandinavia.

“Sympathetic feeling toward states is not a reason to threaten to kill large numbers of people on their behalf. The U.S. should maintain productive relations with Finland and Sweden, and it need not threaten war for them to serve our interests. They will be fine without becoming American protectorates.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Analysis: Putin in negotiations with U.S. presidents over the years

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Accepting ‘Ugly Terms’: Is This the Only Path to End the Ukraine War?

By Daniel Davis

May 5, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is Trump’s Peace Plan for Ukraine All That Bad?

By Daniel DePetris

May 2, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s Ukraine minerals agreement is a terrible deal for the US

By Daniel DePetris

May 1, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Russia expulsion of Ukrainian forces from Kursk removes hurdle to peace

Featuring Christopher McCallion

April 28, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine Has Already Lost The War. That’s Not Donald Trump’s Fault

By Daniel Davis

April 27, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved