Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Talking to China advances U.S. security
China, Asia

May 9, 2023

Talking to China advances U.S. security

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 9, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Yesterday, following a meeting in Beijing with U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns, Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang stressed the need for the U.S. and China to stabilize relations. This was the first time the two have met since the balloon incident in February. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“A meeting between U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns and Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang should be routine—that it’s not reflects the unfortunate state of this critical bilateral relationship. An excessively hostile posture toward Beijing, and an assumption that some kind of cold, or even hot, war is unavoidable, has taken hold of Washington’s approach to the Asia-Pacific region, which is bad for both U.S. national security and our country’s economic interests. Both demand a pragmatic working relationship between the world’s two most powerful countries.

“The last meeting between the American and Chinese heads of state took place for just a few hours in Bali about six months ago, but such brief discussions are woefully inadequate. The Biden Administration should give U.S.-China relations the focus and resources it deserves. At a minimum, there should be an annual presidential summit, but this should be accompanied by continuous engagement by the national security establishment, and particularly by America’s chief diplomats. The two sides are certain to disagree on many or even most points, yet the imperative is to seek points of agreement to safeguard American prosperity and, more urgently, to prevent an armed showdown that could entail immeasurable destruction.

“Responsible competition with China would clearly define U.S. vital interests, the challenges and threats China might pose to them, and specific courses of action to advance our national priorities. An ill-defined antagonism is the opposite of strategy, and a reactionary policy that seeks to oppose anything and everything Beijing does risks U.S. exhaustion—and a collision with China, which is in neither country’s interest.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on China

ExplainerTaiwan, Asia, China

Will the U.S. go to war over Taiwan?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 15, 2025

op-edTaiwan, Asia, China

Here’s how Trump can prevent a war over Taiwan

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 15, 2025

pollTaiwan, Asia, China

Expert survey: Will the U.S. defend Taiwan?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 15, 2025

op-edAsia, China, Diplomacy

India’s thaw in relations with China is nothing to fear

By Lyle Goldstein

September 14, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

U.S.-China rivalry sparks a submarine arms race

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

September 8, 2025

op-edTaiwan, Asia, China

Is an amphibious invasion of Taiwan really imminent?

By Gil Barndollar

August 20, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved