Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / US-Israel-Iran / Congress must demand Iran war answers from Trump administration
US‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

March 24, 2026

Congress must demand Iran war answers from Trump administration

By Daniel DePetris

On Monday, just days after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth confirmed the Trump administration’s gargantuan $200 billion supplemental request for the war in Iran, President Donald Trump stated that ceasefire talks were underway.

Iranian regime officials quickly dispelled those statements as blather seeking to mollify the energy markets. But whether talks have occurred or will occur, it’s clear that Trump still wants Congress to write him a $200 billion check. Asked whether the budding diplomacy meant the $200 billion ask was no longer needed, Trump said it would “always be nice to have” because the international security situation was dangerous. In other words, the administration is likely to push for the plus-up regardless.

This isn’t surprising in the least. Trump wants an astounding $1.5 trillion for the U.S. military, funds that would be allocated in part to rebuilding the Pentagon’s munitions stockpile, investing in the next generation of weapons systems, and funding Trump’s pet project, the Golden Dome anti-missile defense system. The $200 billion would be on top of the roughly $150 billion in extra defense money that was appropriated last year in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, most of which has already been earmarked according to the Pentagon’s acting chief financial officer.

Thus far, Republicans have granted the White House a huge leash on what goals the U.S. military should be pursuing in Iran, what victory should look like, and how the war should be fought. On one level, this is hardly out of the ordinary. The president is commander in chief, after all.

Read at Washington Examiner

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Press ReleaseUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Close the deal, open the strait

By Benjamin Friedman

May 26, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump wants to expand the Abraham Accords. It could sink a deal to end the Iran war.

By Daniel DePetris

May 26, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Each side spins a different story about the U.S.-Iran peace talks—but Tehran may have the last word

By Rajan Menon

May 25, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Iran deja vu: U.S. maintains it inflicted maximum damage as reports suggest otherwise

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

May 22, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s Diplomacy Has Stalled

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Trump has left himself only bad options on Iran

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.