Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / Withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq, don’t continue train, advise mission
Iraq, Counterterrorism, Middle East

July 22, 2021

Withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq, don’t continue train, advise mission

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 22, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. and Iraq will issue a statement supporting a withdrawal of all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the end of the year. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The withdrawal of all U.S. combat troops from Iraq could be a significant step towards full withdrawal and an acknowledgment that there is no sound U.S. security rationale for staying. On the other hand, since it is unclear what portion of the 2,500 troops in Iraq are classified as ‘combat troops,’ the import of this announcement is unclear. It could result in few, if any, U.S. troops leaving by 2022.

“The trouble with the U.S. mission is not that there are still combat troops there, but that there are still troops there, taking rocket fire and risking wider war with Iraqi militias and their Iranian backers for no good reason. The counter-ISIS mission in Iraq was achieved by the U.S. and its Iraqi partners more than three years ago, when ISIS lost its last territorial holdings in the country. ISIS is degraded to a point where local actors, including the Iraqi government and the Kurdish peshmerga, can manage the threat.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

What comes next in the Israeli-Iranian conflict?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 30, 2025

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved