Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / Withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq, don’t continue train, advise mission
Iraq, Counterterrorism, Middle East

July 22, 2021

Withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq, don’t continue train, advise mission

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 22, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. and Iraq will issue a statement supporting a withdrawal of all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the end of the year. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The withdrawal of all U.S. combat troops from Iraq could be a significant step towards full withdrawal and an acknowledgment that there is no sound U.S. security rationale for staying. On the other hand, since it is unclear what portion of the 2,500 troops in Iraq are classified as ‘combat troops,’ the import of this announcement is unclear. It could result in few, if any, U.S. troops leaving by 2022.

“The trouble with the U.S. mission is not that there are still combat troops there, but that there are still troops there, taking rocket fire and risking wider war with Iraqi militias and their Iranian backers for no good reason. The counter-ISIS mission in Iraq was achieved by the U.S. and its Iraqi partners more than three years ago, when ISIS lost its last territorial holdings in the country. ISIS is degraded to a point where local actors, including the Iraqi government and the Kurdish peshmerga, can manage the threat.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Iraq

In the mediaIraq, Basing and force posture, Global posture, Middle East

Bring our troops home: A case for full U.S. withdrawal from Iraq

Featuring William Walldorf

March 6, 2025

op-edSyria, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

If Trump wants to win in the Middle East, he must focus on security, not grand visions

By William Walldorf

February 20, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Iraq, Israel, Middle East

Trump’s Middle East plan would commit U.S. to Iraq War 2.0

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Iraq, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Syria

Trump foreign policy 2.0: Unpredictable president confronts unstable world

By Daniel DePetris

January 31, 2025

In the mediaIraq, Middle East

What will actually happen to the American forces in Iraq?

Featuring Dan Caldwell and Michael DiMino

October 6, 2024

In the mediaGrand strategy, Iraq, Middle East

Who Won the VP Debate, Vance or Walz?

Featuring Daniel DePetris

October 1, 2024

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved