Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / Waiving Nord Stream 2 sanctions makes sense
Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Sanctions

May 18, 2021

Waiving Nord Stream 2 sanctions makes sense

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 18, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Axios reported that the Biden administration will waive sanctions on the company in charge of Nord Stream 2 construction. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Sanctioning German companies over the nearly complete Nord Stream 2 pipeline is a futile gesture likely to damage relations with Germany, and further trash relations with Russia, for no clear benefit. A decision to waive sanctions, while contrary to past indications from the Biden administration, would be welcome.

“The idea that the pipeline will make Germany dangerously dependent on Russia is misguided. Dependence runs both ways; buyers get some power, too. Economic interdependence is not a bad thing for deepening the peace among these historical antagonists. Germany can figure out its own interests.

“The United States shouldn’t tell Germany how to buy its energy, let alone use sanctions to enforce its preferences. Using sanctions this way is a form of economic bullying contrary to Washington’s self-proclaimed role as global leader and an accelerant for economic powers like Germany to limit their dependence on U.S. financial institutions, including the dollar.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe and Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Welcome to a Global Nuclear Arms Dilemma

By Daniel DePetris

February 6, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Russia

Russia warns of response to any U.S. weapons deployment in Greenland

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

February 5, 2026

In the mediaRussia, Nuclear weapons

Expiry of nuclear weapons pact between U.S. and Russia risks new arms race

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

February 3, 2026

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Salvaging a New START

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 30, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved