Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security
Middle East, Counterterrorism, Grand strategy

September 21, 2021

Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 21, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden delivered an address at the United Nations General Assembly. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“For the first time in 20 years, a U.S. president addressed the U.N. General Assembly without a single U.S. soldier deployed on Afghan soil. Concluding the longest war in U.S. history and extricating U.S. forces from Afghanistan should be commended.

“Despite President Biden’s proclamation that the U.S. is no longer a nation at war, the U.S. military continues to fight a global war on terrorism that shows no sign of ending anytime soon. The U.S. operates train-and-advise operations in dozens of countries around the world, from Niger and Madagascar to the Philippines and India. U.S. drone and air strikes continue in Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. Approximately 2,500 U.S. troops remain in Iraq, more than two years after ISIS’s caliphate was destroyed. Nearly 1,000 U.S. soldiers remain in Eastern Syria, in a highly dangerous environment, on behalf of a mission that Congress hasn’t debated, let alone authorized.

“The U.S. exit from Afghanistan was an important step in winding down Washington’s post-9/11 mistakes, but the U.S. should extricate itself from open-ended presence missions throughout the Middle East and Africa. Instead, the U.S. should focus on the limited anti-U.S. terror threats that exist. Targeted raids and intelligence sharing with local U.S. partners are more effective than our costly, open-ended forward troop deployments.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Maximalism will doom diplomacy with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Middle East

As Donald Trump prepares for Middle East visit, his efforts there aren’t inspiring

By Daniel DePetris

May 6, 2025

Press ReleaseHouthis, Air power, Middle East, Military analysis, Yemen

Ending strikes on Yemen: Good news if it sticks

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 6, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump needs his team on the same Iran page

By Daniel DePetris

May 5, 2025

op-edYemen, Air power, Houthis, Iran, Middle East

In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an ‘airpower trap’ that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars

By William Walldorf

May 5, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved