Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security
Middle East, Counterterrorism, Grand strategy

September 21, 2021

Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 21, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden delivered an address at the United Nations General Assembly. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“For the first time in 20 years, a U.S. president addressed the U.N. General Assembly without a single U.S. soldier deployed on Afghan soil. Concluding the longest war in U.S. history and extricating U.S. forces from Afghanistan should be commended.

“Despite President Biden’s proclamation that the U.S. is no longer a nation at war, the U.S. military continues to fight a global war on terrorism that shows no sign of ending anytime soon. The U.S. operates train-and-advise operations in dozens of countries around the world, from Niger and Madagascar to the Philippines and India. U.S. drone and air strikes continue in Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. Approximately 2,500 U.S. troops remain in Iraq, more than two years after ISIS’s caliphate was destroyed. Nearly 1,000 U.S. soldiers remain in Eastern Syria, in a highly dangerous environment, on behalf of a mission that Congress hasn’t debated, let alone authorized.

“The U.S. exit from Afghanistan was an important step in winding down Washington’s post-9/11 mistakes, but the U.S. should extricate itself from open-ended presence missions throughout the Middle East and Africa. Instead, the U.S. should focus on the limited anti-U.S. terror threats that exist. Targeted raids and intelligence sharing with local U.S. partners are more effective than our costly, open-ended forward troop deployments.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What Israel’s Qatar strike on Hamas reveals

By Daniel DePetris

September 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

What does Trump want in Gaza?

By Daniel DePetris

September 4, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Sanctions

Why European countries want to reimpose harsh sanctions on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Syria

Donald Trump tries to make history in Syria and Lebanon

By Daniel DePetris

August 26, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved