Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security
Middle East, Counterterrorism, Grand strategy

September 21, 2021

Turning the page on 20 years of war would benefit U.S. security

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 21, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden delivered an address at the United Nations General Assembly. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“For the first time in 20 years, a U.S. president addressed the U.N. General Assembly without a single U.S. soldier deployed on Afghan soil. Concluding the longest war in U.S. history and extricating U.S. forces from Afghanistan should be commended.

“Despite President Biden’s proclamation that the U.S. is no longer a nation at war, the U.S. military continues to fight a global war on terrorism that shows no sign of ending anytime soon. The U.S. operates train-and-advise operations in dozens of countries around the world, from Niger and Madagascar to the Philippines and India. U.S. drone and air strikes continue in Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. Approximately 2,500 U.S. troops remain in Iraq, more than two years after ISIS’s caliphate was destroyed. Nearly 1,000 U.S. soldiers remain in Eastern Syria, in a highly dangerous environment, on behalf of a mission that Congress hasn’t debated, let alone authorized.

“The U.S. exit from Afghanistan was an important step in winding down Washington’s post-9/11 mistakes, but the U.S. should extricate itself from open-ended presence missions throughout the Middle East and Africa. Instead, the U.S. should focus on the limited anti-U.S. terror threats that exist. Targeted raids and intelligence sharing with local U.S. partners are more effective than our costly, open-ended forward troop deployments.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

U.S. signs landmark nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia that could pave the way for domestic nuclear enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 23, 2026

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Nuclear weapons

Saudi enrichment risks morphing into U.S. security guarantee

By Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edIran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

In Defense of Détente with Iran

By Lyle Goldstein

July 22, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

Hypocrisy Outrage As Trump Agrees to Saudi Nuclear Deal While Bombing Iran for Nuclear Enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump Needs to Defy History to End the Iran War

By William Walldorf

July 21, 2026

Op-edHouthis, Middle East

The Houthi blockade puts Trump in a serious bind

By Rosemary Kelanic

July 21, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.