Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / Troop drawdown in Iraq is welcome but should go further
Iraq, Middle East, Syria

August 28, 2020

Troop drawdown in Iraq is welcome but should go further

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 28, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Wall Street Journal reported the Pentagon will be withdrawing a third of the U.S. forces in Iraq, drawing down troop numbers to 3,500. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“This is a welcome move toward reducing the U.S. military presence in the Middle East, but it stops short of a full withdrawal from Iraq, which is what best serves U.S. interests. After the defeat of ISIS’s caliphate, U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria were left without a militarily attainable objective and asked to pursue an open-ended mission disconnected from American security.

“Even once U.S. troops depart from Iraq, our ability to monitor and conduct strikes against targets that pose legitimate threats to American security will remain unparalleled. Troops permanently stationed in Iraq and exposed to regional troublemakers weakens our defense—bringing them home or offshore strengthens the U.S.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Iraq

In the mediaIraq, Basing and force posture, Global posture, Middle East

Bring our troops home: A case for full U.S. withdrawal from Iraq

Featuring William Walldorf

March 6, 2025

op-edSyria, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

If Trump wants to win in the Middle East, he must focus on security, not grand visions

By William Walldorf

February 20, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Iraq, Israel, Middle East

Trump’s Middle East plan would commit U.S. to Iraq War 2.0

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 12, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Iraq, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Syria

Trump foreign policy 2.0: Unpredictable president confronts unstable world

By Daniel DePetris

January 31, 2025

In the mediaIraq, Middle East

What will actually happen to the American forces in Iraq?

Featuring Dan Caldwell and Michael DiMino

October 6, 2024

In the mediaGrand strategy, Iraq, Middle East

Who Won the VP Debate, Vance or Walz?

Featuring Daniel DePetris

October 1, 2024

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved