Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Houthis / The U.S. shouldn’t pick winners and losers in Yemen’s war
Houthis, Yemen

January 10, 2021

The U.S. shouldn’t pick winners and losers in Yemen’s war

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 10, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Reuters reported the U.S. plans to designate the Houthi rebel group in Yemen as a foreign terrorist organization, placing restrictions on those who would deal with the militia. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“Designating the Houthis as a Foreign Terrorist Organization is a high-risk, low-reward decision for the U.S. Rather than constraining Tehran for backing the rebel group, it will add to U.S.-Iran tensions that are in desperate need of deescalation, worsen Yemen’s dire humanitarian situation, increase hunger throughout the civilian population and put Washington in the position of penalizing foreign governments, humanitarian workers, and the U.N. itself for interacting with the group in any capacity.

“While the Houthis have committed war crimes in the course of the six-year civil war, the group is not a direct national security threat to the American people or to U.S. interests in the Middle East. Its ambitions are local and the group holds few—if any—assets outside Yemen, which means designating the Houthis as terrorists will have no impact on the group’s ability to function. However, the approximately 70 percent of the Yemeni population under Houthi control will suffer as aid flows dry up and channels of communication are further constricted.

“By assisting the Saudi-led military coalition with logistics, intelligence, and diplomatic support, the U.S. is unwisely picking winners and losers in a tertiary civil war and sullying its moral authority. The incoming Biden administration should remove the U.S. from Yemen’s war, cut off all support to the Saudi-led coalition, and encourage the U.N.-led diplomatic track—changes that would send a message to Riyadh and Abu Dhabi that they aren’t entitled to unconditional U.S. support.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Syria

Donald Trump tries to make history in Syria and Lebanon

By Daniel DePetris

August 26, 2025

op-edSyria, Middle East

Trump’s Syria gamble

By Daniel DePetris

August 22, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

The U.S. must stop enabling Israel’s destruction of Gaza

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 14, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

Events on Houthis

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved