Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The next Secretary of State should end U.S. foreign policy overstretch
Grand strategy

November 23, 2020

The next Secretary of State should end U.S. foreign policy overstretch

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 23, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Media reports anticipate President-elect Biden will select Antony Blinken as Secretary of State and Jake Sullivan as national security adviser. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“President-elect Biden’s top national security advisors will be experienced public servants with qualifications beyond reproach. While professionalism is a welcome return, a lack of it is not the primary problem with U.S. foreign policy.

“Advocates of restraint seek a fundamental break with past orthodoxies in Washington. How the United States has engaged with the world for the past several decades—liberal hegemony—has failed. A series of needless wars and costly commitments burden U.S. foreign policy with risks out of proportion to the security that geography, wealth, and military might provide.

“Talk about restoring U.S. leadership is fine, but policy should reflect narrow U.S. interests, respect the limits international politics impose, and end overstretch.

“A shift to greater restraint begins with ending the wars, as President-elect Biden promised during the campaign, including sticking to the plan to fully withdraw from Afghanistan by May 2021. It means not only complying with the Iran deal, but also loosening U.S.-Saudi ties and taking advantage of reduced enmity with Iran to get U.S. combat forces out of the Middle East. It means engaging in productive diplomacy with Russia to extend the New START treaty and reduce tension in Eastern Europe. It means limiting and focusing competition with China to avoid a needlessly costly and risky new cold war. These are sensible moves no matter who is in charge.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Grand strategy

Q&AGrand strategy, Cuba, Western Hemisphere

Will U.S. pressure lead to regime collapse in Cuba?

By Daniel DePetris

March 27, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, China, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

The real U.S. energy security problem—and how to fix it

By Rosemary Kelanic

March 27, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Cyber

Rise of the AI Soldiers

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s Golden Dome is a destabilizing pipe dream

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 26, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, China‑Taiwan, Israel, Ukraine‑Russia

The U.S. Military Must Save Itself Before Saving Others

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 25, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy

How Trump’s Board of Peace is set up for a multibillion dollar fail

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 19, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.