Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Syria is strategically unimportant, and its reconstruction is a burden, not a prize
Syria, Middle East

October 22, 2019

Syria is strategically unimportant, and its reconstruction is a burden, not a prize

By Gil Barndollar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 22, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Tuesday, President Putin of Russia and President Erdogan of Turkey met to discuss the Turkish incursion into Syria and seek a new status quo for the Middle East nation torn from years of civil war. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Gil Barndollar issued the following statement in response:

“Whatever one thinks of the presidents of Turkey and Russia, their meeting may be a useful step toward negotiating an end to the violence in Syria.

“The defeat of ISIS’s caliphate left the United States in notional control of a large portion of Syria with no vital interests in the country. A methodical, full withdrawal was the best policy, returning Syrian land back to Syria.

“Staying in Syria after the fall of ISIS’s last stronghold in March created an American quasi-protectorate that was never politically or militarily sustainable. Kurdish reconciliation with Assad, however distasteful, was inevitable. The hubris of U.S. officials in Washington—and the administration’s indecision—has now made that outcome as rushed and painful as possible.

“U.S. withdrawal from northern Syria, however, will force local actors to resolve the crisis on their own. The responsibility for Syria’s future and eventual reconstruction is a burden, not a prize.

“The Trump administration’s plan to leave a residual force behind—in the oil fields of the northeast and the al-Tanf base in the southeast—will hinder Syrian reconstruction and encourage further false hopes of a U.S. solution to the conflict.

“The United States has completed its achievable military objectives in Syria and should implement a full withdrawal of all remaining forces.”

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved