Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Record defense budget request fails to focus on defense priorities
Grand strategy, China, Ukraine

March 10, 2023

Record defense budget request fails to focus on defense priorities

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 10, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—This week, the Biden administration unveiled its 2024 budget which includes a request of $886 billion for defense spending. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden administration’s request of $886 billion for national defense spending in 2024 is an extraordinary amount. That total, in real terms, would be higher defense spending than at any point since World War II, and far more than at any point in the Cold War, even without spending destined for Ukraine, which is not included in regular defense appropriations.

“This historically high spending on defense comes in spite of exploding national debt, which has now grown to be about the size of the U.S. gross domestic product. And it comes without an obvious cause. As opposed to the late aughts, when defense spending reached similar plateaus due to Iraq and Afghanistan, the nation’s war costs now constitute a small fragment of defense’s total.

“Nor is the defense spending boom an effort to balance China. Were that true, the recent increases—over 20 percent real growth since 2015—would be devoted to efforts most likely to be useful in a war with China, like submarines and long-range aviation. The increase is instead spread across the board, suggesting a lack of strategy.

“If U.S. support for Ukraine continues as it has, as the administration suggests it will, real defense spending will exceed a trillion dollars. And even that would not include various other pots of security related spending—Veterans, Homeland Security, the FBI, and more.

“Regular Americans are not getting a good security return for this vast investment—it is a drag on their welfare. The defense budget mostly serves special interests and other countries’ security. The real cost of U.S. security is far cheaper than what we pay for it.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved