Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Record defense budget request fails to focus on defense priorities
Grand strategy, China, Ukraine

March 10, 2023

Record defense budget request fails to focus on defense priorities

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 10, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—This week, the Biden administration unveiled its 2024 budget which includes a request of $886 billion for defense spending. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden administration’s request of $886 billion for national defense spending in 2024 is an extraordinary amount. That total, in real terms, would be higher defense spending than at any point since World War II, and far more than at any point in the Cold War, even without spending destined for Ukraine, which is not included in regular defense appropriations.

“This historically high spending on defense comes in spite of exploding national debt, which has now grown to be about the size of the U.S. gross domestic product. And it comes without an obvious cause. As opposed to the late aughts, when defense spending reached similar plateaus due to Iraq and Afghanistan, the nation’s war costs now constitute a small fragment of defense’s total.

“Nor is the defense spending boom an effort to balance China. Were that true, the recent increases—over 20 percent real growth since 2015—would be devoted to efforts most likely to be useful in a war with China, like submarines and long-range aviation. The increase is instead spread across the board, suggesting a lack of strategy.

“If U.S. support for Ukraine continues as it has, as the administration suggests it will, real defense spending will exceed a trillion dollars. And even that would not include various other pots of security related spending—Veterans, Homeland Security, the FBI, and more.

“Regular Americans are not getting a good security return for this vast investment—it is a drag on their welfare. The defense budget mostly serves special interests and other countries’ security. The real cost of U.S. security is far cheaper than what we pay for it.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Grand strategy

ExplainerNATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Let Europe rearm: Capitalize on NATO’s five percent pledge

By Thomas P. Cavanna

June 23, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy

Trump’s intelligence pick renews debate: Is the office needed?

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

June 18, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy

Trump’s defense budget request contradicts ‘America First’ principles

By Adam Gallagher

June 9, 2026

ExplainerBurden sharing, Basing and force posture, Europe and Eurasia

Stop bargaining with Europe, start leaving

By Benjamin Friedman and Moritz Graefrath

May 27, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy

Tulsi Gabbard Takes the Exit Ramp

Featuring William Walldorf

May 22, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s Diplomacy Has Stalled

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Donate
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.