Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Progress on full withdrawal from Syria is optimal policy
Syria, Basing and force posture, Middle East, Military analysis

April 17, 2025

Progress on full withdrawal from Syria is optimal policy

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 17, 2025
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Recent reports indicate that the Trump administration is considering a reduction of U.S. forces stationed in Syria. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“Every rationale used to maintain a U.S. military presence in Syria is no longer relevant today. ISIS’s caliphate was destroyed during President Trump’s first term and now exists as a low-level insurgency fighting multiple adversaries, including the new Syrian government. With the Assad regime’s collapse, Iran’s influence in Syria is at a low point. Russia, one of Assad’s biggest foreign backers, struggles to retain some of its deteriorating military presence. And the Syrian Kurds are exploring the benefits of rapprochement with the new government in Damascus.

“The Trump administration’s consideration of a partial troop departure from Syria is a productive step, and the U.S. should go further and urgently withdraw all permanent military forces there. Withdrawal would not only finally end a mission that accomplished its goals years ago, but also facilitate a much-needed deprioritization of Syria and the Middle East. Local actors in the region—with a far greater stake in Syria—will be forced to take primary responsibility for the burden of an effective political transition there.

“Keeping U.S. forces in Syria will delay this process and increase the risk American servicemembers will become a target if the regional security environment deteriorates.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Trump’s Iran gamble is already backfiring disastrously

By Daniel DePetris

June 25, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

How Trump took advantage of Iran’s face-saving retaliation strategy

By Daniel DePetris

June 24, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved